Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

Case 3:00—cv—00339-RNC Document 142 Filed 09/14/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 3:00-cv-00339-RNC Document 141 Filed 09/12/2006 Page 1 of2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
1***RR****iii*·k'k*kiiii***i‘l*****i**‘***·i·I****
THOMAS O’CONNOR * CIVIL ACTION NO.: 3:00CV339 (RNC)
Plaintiff, :
V. *
LYNNE B. PIERSON, ei al. *
Defendants. *
* SEPTEMBER 12, 2006
****·k*·k*i*****************i****************
MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND
TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
The plaintiff requests until September 18, 2006 to respond to the Defendants'
Motion for Summary Judgment. This time is needed because of the undersigned‘s trial
schedule. The undersigned is picking a jury in Rice v. Meriden Housing Authority, etal.,
Docket No.; CV—03-04795568.
The defendants' attorney, Michael J. Rose, does not object to this motion.
rd ‘· I L; l THE PLAINTIFF,
8 "% J -.
s\ si t i
S in · By; ·
O gi ' Leon M. Rosenblatt ct00284)
rn i: Law Oftices of Leon M. Rosenblatt
E", 10 North Main Street
rd *,3* West Hartford. CT 06107
B 5 (860) 523-8066
E .
U Z
.i.i
M
t.;< B
¢:>
¤ nd
|.'\'|
ti?
·-•
$4
§
uz
D
D4
nv
no