Free Order on Motion to Strike - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

_ v_ Case 3:OO—cv—O032@CH Document 110 Filed 11/23003 lZag(eJ &/to
UN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F E D
_ FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
\ : -\
in ,zni11SEP·?> PEB
HENRY A KORSZUN; WOJTEK W. Civil Action Neg i)IS‘l"l* BOROWSKI and COMPUCLOZ : 300CV327 (J BRIDGEPIBRT Cl
CORPORATION : <6`•9I
Plaintiffs, :
VS.
K September 3, 2003
PUBLIC TECHNOLOGIES MULTIMEDIA, INC.,: M
J.C. PENNEY COMPANY, INC.; : t
MATTEL, INC. andlor : 1
BRODERBUND SOFTWARE, INC.; : i
and LANDS’ END, INC., :
Defendants. : -
N A ( l
* `Q /§ MOTION TO STRIKE REPLY MEMORANDUM l
F \ REGARDING MOTION FOR AWARD OF ATTORNEYS FEES N
\ \
§’ I i
§ Plaintiffs move to strike the "RepIy Memorandum of Law In Further Support of
‘ Q &)`®ndants’ Motion For Award of Attorneys Fees." i
~ In the "Reply Memorandum", Defendants present new facts and arguments that f
ere notgqcluded in their opening motion and memorandum. In lengthy chunks of
,;;1‘ i
.. m
5 sjfjjgle spaced text, Defendants review the patent file history, Mr. Korszun’s deposition, \
1 _rg It QA F-
Qgast set@ment. conferences, the parties contentions, expert reports, expert depositions, i
mama-;_., (·\j. I _ l
§_a_nz_d sutfiiit an additional Declaration and copies of correspondence pertaining to
J ‘: · i
tn Defend§hts’ legal positions and settlement discussions. {
l
\. J J
Q ~ Mx l

\ Q
\/S I . l
"" . ....._
—_—%—— :-“i`f;"°`f;E‘* *i;¥?*?£¥?;;>?;*-5:;;;::;;; ;- ; ; E ; ,. . .._, _ _