Free Order - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

~»r I.......·.·Y ._..¢.4 I
·- Case 3:00-cv—00302-EBB Document 32 Filed 10/31/2003 Page 1 of 2
III . I
* I I
I IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
I I FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT II I.-:
.
‘``‘‘‘‘‘‘‘`‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘`‘‘‘‘‘°`‘‘``‘‘```‘``‘````‘``‘‘‘``‘``‘`‘‘ ". Iv B I
I ¤ERRucI< TAYLOR I III I
. I ia;96 CV 2156 (DFM) III III EJ
V 1 2::; **2
CLAUDE LIGHT ET AL. : DATE: OCT. 31, 2003 I
‘ -------···----—-----·--------·-·-----------—--—--------·--- X I I
··························································· X
DERRICK TAYLOR
I : 3:97 CV 1973 (DJS)(TPS) I
v. F I
A. RODRIGUEZ ET AL. DATE: OCT. 31, 2003
``````‘`‘```°``````‘‘‘````‘````‘`‘`‘°`‘`‘``‘‘`‘‘‘"‘‘`‘‘‘‘‘‘ " I
I --------------------------------------------------—-------- x I I
I I DERRICK TAYI.0R I PQI5 I/
I : 3:00 CV 302 (EBB)
I " Q
JOHN J. ARMSTRONG ET AL. : DATE: OCT. 31, 2003
············"···········“·······*"·‘“**··········*········· X-
----------------——-—-—---—————~-————--—-------------------- x I
1:>ERRIcK TAY1.0R I I
2 3:00 CV 787 (AWT)
V- 2 I
LARRY MYERS ET AL. DATE: OCT. 31, 2003
....... I .................................................. xl I
I
IR•v.8fBQ) I
II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I __ I __ I I I I II I II I I`I` T CIT` T * Ti ’*? I?
I. ._ I _. I I __ I __ I I IIIIIII I I
I; I I I I .I I I I I I I I I I I __ I I II I I II I II I 'I`I T" "" T 0 T" II ° `**¥ `I

" Case 3:00-cv—00302-EBB Document 32 Filed 10/31/2003 Page 2 of 2
MEMORANDUM OF STATUS CONFERENCE
E N Date of Conference: October 31, 2003
Attorneys Present: Sarah Poston, Esq. (Pro Bono Counsel For Plaintiff)(by telephone) N
f Mr. Derrick Taylor (by telephone) N
‘ Steven Strom, Esq. (For Defendants)(by telephone)
‘ DISCUSSIONS
` Brief discussions were held regarding plaintiffs pro se Motions to Enforce
Settlement, filed in August-September 2003 (Ligm, Dkt. #67; Rodriguez, Dkt. #47;
Armstrong, Dkt. #30; Mygg, Dkt. #28). Counsel agreed to the deadlines set forth below.
I ORDERS i
1. By agreement of counsel, plaintiffs counsel will file supplemental briefs in support N
of plaintiff’s motions on or before December 12, 2003, defendants will fil their briefs in
i opposition on or before January 12, 2004, and plaintiff may file a reply brief on or before
_ Januag; 23, 2004.
I 2. After review of these briefs, the Magistrate Judge will determine if an evidentiary N
. hearing is necessary, as argued by plaintiff, or if the issues can be determined on the N
papers, as argued by defendants.
_ 3. The Magistrate Judge is available for such other conferences (which may be held
1 l telephonically) as may be necessary.
_ Dated at New Haven, Connecticut, this 31st day of October, 2003.
s
\\ A \ l N
, v '
JE er Margolis _ N
U. . Magistrate Judge
ftmssl N