Page 1 of 1
OAO 247 (02/08) Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for the __________ District of Connecticut_________ United States of America v.
Date of Previous Judgment: November 12, 2002
(Use Date of Last Amended Judgment if Applicable)
) ) ) ) ) )
Case No: 00-CR-263 USM No: 14533-014
Deirdre A. Murray
Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) Upon motion of the defendant the Director of the Bureau of Prisons the court under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) for a reduction in the term of imprisonment imposed based on a guideline sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered and made retroactive by the United States Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 994(u), and having considered such motion, IT IS ORDERED that the motion is: DENIED. GRANTED and the defendant's previously imposed sentence of imprisonment (as reflected in the last judgment issued) of 121 months months is reduced to 120 months . I. COURT DETERMINATION OF GUIDELINE RANGE (Prior to Any Departures) Previous Offense Level: 31 Amended Offense Level: Criminal History Category: II Criminal History Category: Previous Guideline Range: 121 to 151 months Amended Guideline Range: 29 II 120
II. SENTENCE RELATIVE TO AMENDED GUIDELINE RANGE The reduced sentence is within the amended guideline range. The previous term of imprisonment imposed was less than the guideline range applicable to the defendant at the time of sentencing as a result of a departure or Rule 35 reduction, and the reduced sentence is comparably less than the amended guideline range. Other (explain):
III. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS
Except as provided above, all provisions of the judgment dated November 12, 2002 shall remain in effect. IT IS SO ORDERED.
Order Date: May 2, 2008 /s/ Janet C. Hall Judge's signature Janet C. Hall, U.S. District Judge Printed name and title
Effective Date: (if different from order date)