Free Probation Form 12 - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

I '"VV ""`“` ``"'` "`““ ""`;;"““'Tf""""""‘““ "“‘*——“m*"""‘;··—·—-~·--——————1'-e-—-··l—-”* —-—-———~—-—-.-»»_e»e....e..a..E.eeen__.__.._____
I farm *2 Case 3:00-cr-00186-RNC Document 366 Filed 05/O2/2007 Page 1 of 2
I UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
I . · DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
4.
I U.S.A. vs. JOSE ROLDAN Docket No. 3:00CRtQ_tt1)B/6(RNC)
I if
I AMENDED PETITION ON PROBATION AND SUPERVISED RELEA/2; ‘ » _»5!ij’?_g$”?
. L J l" .4 {fw:
I A COMES NOW Xenia T, Gray, PROBATION OFFICER OF THE COURT, presenting an officiafffeipomupon the conduct
and attitude of JOSE ROLDAN who was sentenced to 18 months imprisonment, consecutive to the state seiyjence, for a
yioletiori of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1344(1) and (2), Bank Fraud, by the Honorable Robert N. Chatigny, Chief U.§s.,District t:idQe§itting
in the court at Hartford on July 24, 2001, who fixed the period of supervision at four years which cominenird on Ma ch 14,
2003, and imposed the general terms and conditions tneretofore adopted by the Court and aiso imposed‘;;spebi_al conditions
and terms as follows: (1) The defendant shall pay restitution in the amount of $75,123.49 to Fleet Bantk*an‘d‘$350.01 to
Glastonbury Bank and Trust to be paid at the rate of $100 per month; and (2) The defendant shall participate in a program of
substance abuse monitoring, counseling and treatment as directed by the probation office; the defendant will pay atl, or a
portion oi, the costs associated with any such treatment, based on his ability to pay, in an amount to be determined by the
United States Probation Office.
On August4, 2004, the defendantappeared fora violation hearing and admitted to violating seven conditions of his supervised I
release. The defendant`s term of supervised release was revoked and he was sentenced to a term of incarceration for 12 I
months and 1 day followed by three years of supervised release. The following additional special conditions were imposed; I
(1) The defendant will senre the first six months of his term of supervised release confined at his home with eiectronic ‘
monitoring at the Government’s expense; the_ defendant will be allowed to leave his home to work, obtain medical attention, I
attend religious services, and for other reasons specifically authorized in advance by the Probation Office;
* Continued on page 2
RESPECTFULLY PRESENTING PETITION FOR ACTION OF COURT AND FOR CAUSE AS FOLLOWS: ;
The defendant is being cited for violating the foliowing conditions of supervised release:
Charge No. 1 - Mandatory Condition: "While on supervised release you shall not commit anotherfederal state or local crime. I
You shalt not illegally possess a controlled substance" I
On August 16, 2006, the defendantwas arrested bythe Hartford Police Department and charged with Carrying a Pistol Without
a Permit, Weapons in a Vehicle (2 counts) and Criminal Possession ofa Firearm. According to the police report, the defendant _
was operating a motor vehicle that carried three other males. When the arresting officers obsenied the occupants' suspicious
behavior, the vehicle was pulled over and found to have two weapons including a Smith and Wesson .38 caliber and a Smith I
and Wesson .45 caliber on the rear floor. Additionally, one ofthe occupants was wearing a full knit ski mask on his head when
he was removed from the car. A black bandana, half-finger gloves and a nylon half-face mask were also confiscated from the
vehicle. (See `attached report). On February 22, 2007, the defendant appeared in Hartford Superior Court and pled guilty .to
the charge of illegal Possession of a Weapon in a Motor Vehicle and was sentenced to a term of incarceration for one year. '
Mr. Roldan is ourrentty detained at the Robinson Correctional institution in Enfield, Connecticut. His maximum release date
is August 15, 2007. ‘
** Continued on Page 2
PRAYING THAT THE COURT WELL ORDER a warrant be issued to be lodged as a detainer with the period of I
supervision toiled. _ I
ORDER OF COURT IM, Swor to By J _ -
/ "
Considered and ordered this _ ' _ _
dey of iviey, zoo? end dideied tiled end made Xenia T- Gray. U-S r¤i¤¤f·<¤¤ Officer I
a part of the records inthe above case. P I
Place T
I w S,
The Honorable Robert N. Chdignif DBTQ · 1* V -7 ————
Chief United States District Judge rj
Before me, the Honorable Robert N. Chatigny, Chief United states District Judge, on this Bday of l\/lay 2007, U.S. Probation
Officer Xenia T. Gray appeared and under oath stated that the facts set forth in this} petition are true to thejoest of her I
knowledge and belief. I
. Th°e Honorable Robert N. Cuatigfny M- I
Chief.United States District Judge
. _ I
/yy.<: I
- ·:-s-s - 4.f.
e _ I f`7‘i
e `D f 'f·f.· ·: :-s—e-s

. . - I
I Continued f$%afsgaC§é)Q-cr—OO186—RNC Document 366 Filed 05/O2/2007 Page 2 of 2
l * (2) The dfendantwill participate in a program of mental health evaluation, counseling and treatment under the direction of
,the Pfbbation Office; the defendant will pay all, or a portion of, the costs associated with his participation in these programs ;
based on his ability to pay, in an amount to be determined bythe Probation Office; (3) The defendantwill not incur new credit
charges oropen newlines of credit without the permission ofthe Probation Office; (4) The defendantwill provide the Probation
Office with access to any requested financial information; and (5) The defendant will seek and maintain full time employment
or vocational training. Upon release from custody, the defendants term of supervised release commenced on lvlarch 15, 2005.
Charge No.2 — Mandatory Condition; "You shall not possess a firearm as defined in 18 USC. § 921 l .
On August 15, 2006, in Hanford, Connecticut, Jose Roldan operated a motor vehicle with full knowledge that a firearm was l
in it. In a statement documented in the police report, the defendant reported that one of his accomplices showed lvlr. Roidan l
the .357 firearm. Nlr. Roldan grabbed the weapon, looked at it and asked his accompiice why he brought the gun with him.
The accomplice told him that he brought the gun along just in case anything happened. I
,
associate with any person convicted of a felony unless granted permission to do so bythe probation officer." _
On August 16, 2006, in Hartford, Connecticut, the defendant was arrested with Jeorge Armando Diaz and Emilio Mendez, broth
Olwhorn have lengthy felony arrest records with offenses that include robbery, larceny. burglary and possession of narcotics.
The defendant associated with these individuals without permission from the U.S. Probation Officer. I
Charge No. 4 — Special Condition: "The defendant shall pay restitution in the amount of @75 123.49 to Fleet Bank and $350.01
to Glastonbury Bank and Trust to be paid at the rate of $100 per month." _
Mr. Roldan has not submitted a payment toward restitution since September 14, 2005. He has a restitution balance of f
$75,074.00.
I
I I

i
I
( c . 7 I I
- I
I
‘ l