Free Probation Form 12 - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 94.1 kB
Pages: 1
Date: September 20, 2005
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 792 Words, 4,722 Characters
Page Size: 612.72 x 1008 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/8609/52.pdf

Download Probation Form 12 - District Court of Connecticut ( 94.1 kB)


Preview Probation Form 12 - District Court of Connecticut
. Fm *2 Case 3:00-cr—001 50-J BA Document 52 Filed O9/19/2005 Page 1 of 1
, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT i
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
c 'Q `
U.S.A. vs. Denise BAt=ii=lAcks Dockelgjtlo. 3:q9)CR001 JBA) ,
(Nj {(1
AMENDED PETITION ON PROBATION AND SUPERVISED R`El$.E-ASE'; gv
COMES NOW Jennifer Amato, PROBATION OFFICER OF THE COURT, presenting, an oyial Q upon the
. conduct and attitude of Denise Barracks who was sentenced to 3 months custody for a violation of 13%.8.C. § 1341, Mail
Fraud, by the Honorable Janet Bond Arterton sitting in the court at New Haven, Connecticut on A il 2 , 001 who fixed the
period of supervision at five years which commenced on August 22, 2001 and imposed the ge at targus and conditions ,
theretofore adopted by the court and also imposed special conditions and terms as follows: QB, =
i
1) Defendant shall be placed on home confinement with electronic monitoring for the first 3 months of supervised release; 2)
Defendant shall participate in mental health treatment and financial counseling as directed by the U.S. Probation Office; 3) i
Defendant shall release to U.S. Probation Office any and all financial information/records including state and federal income
tax returns, by execution of a release of financial information form, or by any other appropriate means as directed by the U.S.
Probation Office; 4) Defendant is prohibited from incurring new credit charges or opening additional lines of credit without ,
approval of U.S. Probation Office; 5) Defendant shall pay restitution in the amount of $41 ,71 1.80 at a rate of $500 per month. ,
The defendant’s term of supervised release is set to expire on August 21, 2006. 1
RESPECTFULLY PRESENTING PETITION FOR ACTION OF COURT AND FOR CAUSE AS FOLLOWS:
The defendant is being cited for violating the following conditions of supervised release:
Charge No. 1: Standard Condition: You shall not commit another federal, state or local crime. You shaii not illegally possess
a controlled substance. On July 8, 2005, the defendant was arrested by the Glastonbury Police Department via an arrest
warrant. The defendant was charged with two counts of Identity Theft, two counts of Forgery 2“" and Providing a False
Statement. This matter is pending in Manchester Superior Court for August 3, 2005, under docket number: H12M—CR05-
199904-S. The facts outlined in the arrest warrant include that the defendant’s Cox Cable account was in the name of another
female, Paulette Jones, at the address known to the defendant.
Charge No. 2: Special Condition: The defendant shall pay restitution at a rate of $75 per month. To date, the defendant has
paid approximately $1 ,393.72 and is in arrears of $2,206.25 . The most recent payments made include payments of $50 paid
on January 31 , 2005 and March 4, 2005. Lastly, the defendant made a payment of $25 on July 15, 2005 as instructed by the l
probation office. To date, the defendant owes a balance of $40,318.08. l
Charge No. 3: Standard Condition: You shall report to the probation officer and shall submit a truthful and complete written
report within the first five days of each month.. On April 1,2005, the defendant participated in a three way meeting with SUSPO
Cerulio and USPO Ryan iVlacDougall to address issues of non-compliance. At thattime, the defendant was instructed to report
to the probation office on a bi-weekly reporting schedule. The defendant failed to report to the Probation Office until July 15,
2005.
(See back of page) i
PRAYING THAT THE COURT WILL ORDER that this p tition will erve as a summons di recting Denise Barracks ,
to appear before this coun at New Haven, Connecticut on Zi 'ZWS at I-?-· to show cause why i
supervision should not be revoked, a.•,¤4.£s-n¤Lu.Ls·( Qlpy , i
Sworn to By z
ORDER OF COURT * ‘ ·’,- , .. i
Q, Qi J 2 1 rz i
Considered and ordered this I day of l Je nifer L. Amato _
September, 2005 and ordered filed and made a part ofthe I ited 'F ates Probation Officer r
records in the above case. . /1 I Q Eg T EZ : E2
·` Place · _ “
· 2.-. I . . 1 I
Tiliylonorable Janet Bond Arterton DPRG - [
U ` ed States District Judge |
Before me, the Honorable Janet Bond Arterton, United States District Judge, on thislg May of September, 2005 at New N
Haven, Connecticut, U.S. Probation Officer Jennifer L. Amato appeared and under oath stated that the facts set tnrth in this I
petition are true to the best of her knowledge and belief.
T e onorable Janet Bond Arterton
` ed States District Judge
l
FTP i


A " ’ ·i::·i L
n lr `j`’` P `" .. 2 _: 5; e —» 2- 22 ,____ ___ __ g



l` `T `’`’` ” T 2 2 ; ;; - ei- 2 ___ ___%g M V