Free Probation Form 12 - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

,:0,,,, I2 Case 3:00-cr-00263-JCH Document 1955 Filed 09/12/2008 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
U.S.A. vs. MICHAEL GLENN Docket N0. 3:00CR00263(JCH)
AMENDED PETITION ON PROBATION AND SUPERVISED RELEASE
COMES NOW Christopher Rogers, PROBATION OFFICER OF THE COUR”l],preg1ting an official
report upon the conduct and attitude of Michael Glenn, who was sentenced to 78.,n“1’onth§)impri[¤‘nment,
followed by three years’ supervised release for Conspiracy to Possess With Intent t@;\7l§stril$@e Caeeine and
Cocaine Base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(l) and 846 by the Honorable Jarggj. I-Patil, Ugrbistrict
Judge sitting in the court at Bridgeport, Connecticut on November 25, 2002, v@@, fixed the §®iod of
supervision at three years, which commenced on March 9, 2007 and imposed the generaléternr? and @itions
theretofore adopted by the court and also imposed special conditions and terms as f§§vs: 1·¥The defendant
shall participate in a substance abuse treatment program, either inpatient or outpatien‘t,' as $proved by the
probation officer, which may include urinalysis testing to determine if the defendant has used drugs or alcohol.
The defendant shall pay all, or a portion of the costs associated with treatment based on his ability to pay, in
an amount to be determined by the probation officer. Mr Glenn’s supervision concludes on March 8, 2010.
RESPECTFULLY PRESENTING PETITION FOR ACTION OF COURT AND FOR CAUSE AS
FOLLOWS:
The defendant is being cited for violating the following conditions of supervised release:
Charge No. 1: Standard Condition: “The defendant shall not commit another Federal, State, or local crime."
On March 12, 2008, a confidential informant notified Norwalk, Connecticut police officers that the offender
was conducting drug transactions in Norwalk, Connecticut. On that same date, at approximately 4:00 p.m., the
officers trailed the offender in an unmarked car and proceeded to move in and detain the offender in the area
of Commerce Street. A search ofthe vehicle revealed that the offender had 30.96 grams of crack cocaine, 26.5
grams of marijuana, and 10 grams of methadone. Mr. Glenn was charged with Failure to Keep Drugs in
Original Container, in violation of 21a—25 7; Illegal Manufacture, Distribution and Sale of Prescription Drugs
(two counts), in violation of 21 a-277(b) and 21a—278(a), Sale and Possession Within 1500 feet of a School, in
violation of 21a—278a(b), Possession of Narcotics, in violation of 21a-279(a), Possession of a Controlled
Substance, in violation of 21a—279(c), and Illegal Possession Near School, in violation of 21a —279(d). Mr.
Glenn was released on a $150,000 non—surety bond on March 13, 2008. The offender’s next court date is
September 22, 2008, in Norwalk Superior Court, Norwalk, Connecticut
Charge No. 2: Standard Condition: "The defendant shall refrain from excessive use of alcohol and shall not
purchase, possess, use, distribute, or administer any narcotic or other controlled substance, or any paraphernalia
related to such substances, except prescribed by a physician."
On March 31, 2008, the probation officer requested a urine specimen from the offender during a scheduled
office visit. He reported that he was unable to submit one, but admitted that he had been smoking marijuana.
“ The defendant shall comply and adhere to all of the conditions of
electronic monitoring?
On May 16, 2008, the defendant was placed on electronic monitoring. On September 7, 2008, the defendant
removed his ankle monitor, and his current whereabouts are unknown.

Charge N0. ·Q®`t?r1Bi299'@fi1qiligB1?i?J‘£;lllle ddf8ftll1rf1lesilitaflg§]§on ai:il%dpl) The defendant was directed to report to the Probation Office on a weekly basis. He failed to report to the Probation
Office on September 8, 2008, and as indicated above, his current whereabouts are unknown.
PRAYING THAT THE COURT WILL ORDER the issuance of a warrant, with the period of
supervision tolled bringing Mr. Glenn before the Court forthwith to answer charges that he violated the
conditions of his supervision imposed by the Court and this warr t shall serve as a detainer.
ORDER OF COURT cz % By V
Conside d airiordered th 1_ 4 » VQ i I
day of 2008 and ordered filed and made istopher R gers I
a part of t e records in the above case. United States Probation O t 1cer
/\ A r
, _ f"‘·»
I 1 *‘*‘ — sv:-.- ,_ .%.,,1; Place %_/ 6/
Th norable Janet C. Hall i
U States District Judge Date
Before me, the Honorable Janet C. Hall, United States District Judge, on this day /2 {ZL of September
2008 at Bridgeport, Connecticut, U.S. Probation Officer Christopher Rogers appeared and under oath stated
that the facts set forth in this petition are true to the best of his knowledge and belief.
FN - ·
Ia! Janet C. Hail, USD.!
\/ ' V T __L.
e Honorable Janet C. Hall
nited States District Judge
·s•