Free Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 23.8 kB
Pages: 1
Date: September 20, 2007
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 240 Words, 1,415 Characters
Page Size: 610.56 x 792 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/8477/1838.pdf

Download Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply - District Court of Connecticut ( 23.8 kB)


Preview Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply - District Court of Connecticut
C 3:00- -00263-JC 1 ` 0/2007 P 1 f 1
gse °' BEWARE \l’?"RLsi1%‘i913?1 Airrormisr - AT - LAW
Two GANNEU DR1vE, Sums 102 M
WHITE PLA1Ns, NY 10604- ? Yi `
TEL; (914) 644-6660 E-MAIL; ATTRNYLWYR@YAHOOICONl` FAX: (914) 644-6661)
Hill FE? EU /5. |l= ll-1
Sevtsmbeer #9**; ever
Hon. Janet Hall __
U.S. District Judge __ N
District of Connecticut if §
915 Lafayette Boulevard gg
Bridgeport, CT 06604 ‘ ‘¤ ,-L?
..0 IT`;
Re: United States v. Boyd, oo-cr-00263 b ;i;~;
. H 2__s; " U
Your Honor, ii S
On or about March 27th, 2007, I notified the Court of the remand to Your
Honor, from the Second Circuit, for Mr. Patrick St. Surin’s re—sentencing
pursuant to Booker/Fcmfan.
According to the Court’s order, any comments by counsel were to be
submitted no later than April 25*1*, 2007. Unfortunately, I recently discovered
that my now long-since discharged secretary failed to mail out both to the Court
and the U.S. Attorney my written comments.
According to PACER the Court has not yet made a determination as to re-
sentencing. I would respectfully request that counsel be given permission to re-
submit what was prepared and never received by the Court, and that a new re-
sentencing date be set.
Respectfully yours,
Bernard V. Kleinm
cc: Peter Markle, Esq.
Office of the U.S. Attorney
157 Church Street
New Haven, CT 06510