Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

’ Case 3:OO—cr-OOOQAWT Document 289. Filed MQ/2006. _ Page1 of1 ~
2Q)/ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT gfx? ;;?$
A U ~ A _DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT EQ Qwgyiiéf A` A
I I NUS UU ~'\ YD \= .
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : CRIMINAL NO. 3:00CR75jAWTlaV__ ·
’ - A ; civir No. 3:OBCVEIIIBZQAQAT/lT)·¤?;-’*-· A #
A KENNETH HAWKINS · E October 6, 2005 · ` A
g UNITED STATES' SECOND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME A
g On or about August ·l0, 2005, the Court issued an OrderK{A_.
E requiring the Government to file a response to the petition of ,
T Kenneth Hawkins. The Government’s response must explain why the f*
V
§ 5 relief prayed for in the petition should not be granted, and was
5 . initially due on September 14, 2005. AV
E On or about September 7, 2005, the Government requested that
i ` _ the Court grant an extension of 30 days, allowing the Government’s
2 `Aresponse to be filed on or before October 14, 2005. This motion A ` i
5 \_' awas granted. The Government now moves for a second continuance of A A
g _ 30 days, up to and including November 14, 2005. In support of this
5 motion, the United States represented as follows: 'A A
E ` l. Counsel for the Government selected a jury in United
g, States v. Riccitelli, 3:04CR28(JBA), on October 5, 2005. The trial
Q \ is expgpted to last until the last week of October. This case A A-
§MwMA kpvolvgg a?%egations of Racketeering»and Racketeering Conspiracy. 5
Q li The magteriinitially involved over a dozeh defendants, all of whom
gr A®§“:E§ve égeaded guilty but one. The remaining_defendant appeared in
dA iAg§·§ourt.é§n 0September 29, 2005, to plead guiltyr . However,A the _
defendant ultimately elected to not plead guilty. In short, when
{ii f
A M- .,.·~~·!,» IB ’. W . `