Free Motion for Protective Order - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

Case 2:85-cv—01078-PCD Document 268-3 Filed 08/05/2005 Page1 0f2 .

°7/26/2°°5 t:5éé’éi’ {fbi")-%it%0i°d7é?Bi:D Deeiwehi 2’é§'?§AL lgiiggriggii)5/2005 Page 2 of 2 “‘ °°2’°°2
w — .
gi =_ United States Department of the Interior
vi ,1..-_£JZ`I;`:; *5* -
` OFFICE OF THE SOLICITOR
Washington, D.C. 20240
I 4qcH 3 49
IN REPLY REFER T0:
In reply, please address to:
V Main Interior, Room 6456
BY FAX July 26, 2005
Eric Wiechmann, Esq.
McCarter & English, LLP
City Place I
185 Asylum Street
Hartford, CT 06103-3495
Re: In Re Federal Aclmowledginent of Schaghticoke Tribal Nation, 41 IBIA 36
United States v. 43. 47 Acres of Land (Civ. No. H-85-1078 (PCD))
Schagticoke Tribal Nation v. Kent School Corp. (Civ. No. 3:98 CV0l 1 13 (PCD))
Schagticoke Tribal Nation v. United States (Civ. No. 3:00CV 00820 (PCD))
Dear Mr. Wiechmann:
By cover letter dated July 25, 200:3, you submitted on behalf of your client, petitioner
Schaghticoke Tribal Nation, four envelopes of documents. Based on the content of your letter,
only the iirst set of documents and a portion of the second set appear to be within the scope of
material permitted by the anticipated order from Judge Dorsey. Therefore, I advised the Office
of Federal Acknowledgment this moming not to open envelopes two through four until further
discussion with the Office of the Solicitor. At the time of this advice, the envelopes had not been
opened.
Sincerely, I
Barbara N. Coen
Attorney
cc: Distribution list, by FAX y