Free Order on Motion for Reconsideration - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 42.3 kB
Pages: 1
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 292 Words, 1,898 Characters
Page Size: 611 x 792 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/375/86.pdf

Download Order on Motion for Reconsideration - District Court of Connecticut ( 42.3 kB)


Preview Order on Motion for Reconsideration - District Court of Connecticut
. if M `Case 2:85-cr-00050-AVC Document 86 _ Filed 05/23/2008 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT i 1 1 • rr W" fi in
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT /
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA A · CRIMINAL NO U: 3-]
L} ` "*"""'F‘T 1""""F
v. : · .··*
_ ....:xi•~.i·.-· -1
AVELINO GONZALEZ—CLAUDIO · : May 15, 2008
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA’S MOTION TO RECONSHDER IN PART,
RULING ON MOTION FOR DESIGNATIONAS COMPLEX CASE WARRANTING
EXCLUDABLE TIME UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT V
The United States of America (the "Unitegl States") respectfully submits this motion to
reconsider in part, the Cour“t’s May l2, 2008, Ruling on Motion for Designation as Complex Case
Warranting Excludable Time Under Speedy Trial Act ("Excludable Time Ruling" or "Ruling").
Reconsideration is sought with respect to the amount of time deemed excludable under the Speedy
Trial Act. notethat the arguments herein were initially prepared as a response to the defendant’s ·
memorandum in opposition to the United States’ motion that sought a complex case designation
("Complex Case andATolling Motion"),_ which response is due on May 16, 2008, four days after the
Court issued its ruling. S
Argument S
The United States’ Complex Case and Tolling Motion requested that this matter be designated
a complex case warranting excludable time under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A), and sought 18 months
of excludable time in order to prepare for and litigate pretrial proceedings and prepare for trial. The
Court’s Excludable Time Ruling concluded that this matter is a complex case, and that a continuance
2:85CR0050 (AVC) May , 2008. The motion —for reconsideration is
GRANTED, but the relief requested is DENIED.
, so ORDERED. j
y . . l A l A J /
y ~ ’ p hl A|ffeq_y:_C0vell¤, USDJ_
i A sA1fre?$ V. Covello, U.S.D.J.