Free USCA Mandate - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

··· - .. . Case 2:90- -006 -PCD D t 1 ` ·
cv s xi _p _ 9;% wlilleplL·O5g./2007 Page 1 Bt_g0m]_ __ rt
·ff_f?“¥· if ;1 ``F- <· 90-€V·626
M I " 97-cv-2601.
- O0-cv-1115
I 1 R
Trl? ' Tg
_ &°$@ F\ltL:E,§} F4x>,,,
Umted States Court of Appeals Q Q,
FORTHE ° APR - 42007 *·°
SECOND CIRCUIT /30% _ , -
Msrean Amin .
__‘_'""'_"" 8500ND (;tRG°“ C
At a stated Term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second
Circuit, held at the-Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse, 500 Pear]
Street in the City of New York, on the 4th day of April, two thousand seven.
Suzanne M. Searles,
Plaintiff—Appellant,
c
v. 07-Ol_§J;.mv §
Peter Relic, et al., I _; Z via;
L " ti-
Defendants—Appellees. . U
$4 "
Suzanne M. Searles, 5
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v. 07-Ol57—mv
West Hartford Board of Education,
Defendant—Appe1lee.
Suzanne M. Searles,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v. 07-0150-mv
Board of Ed., et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
~-··· A mm cops ~·····...."‘
Thom s W. Asxeen Acting Clerk
by r - .==*=. L _" -e.t =.·f ?";_; -1-SSUED AS MANDATE Cl"] _
“EP’·‘TY CLERK I •

- - . __ _ Case 2:90-cv-00i-PCD Document 191 Filed 05*1/2007 Page 2 of 2
Appellant, tw sg, moves for reconsideration of this Court’s orde s denying her applications for leave
to appeal in 07-0151-mv, 07-0157-mv and 07-015 0-mv. Upon due consideration, it is ORDERED
that the motions for reconsideration are DENIED. gt; Mancuso v. Herbert, 166 F.3cl 97, 99 (2d Cir.
1999) (motion for reconsideration of prior mandate, construed as petition for rehearing, appropriate
where petitioner shows that the Court "overlo0ked or misapprehended significantfacts or legal
arguments."); g also In re Martin-'1`rigona, 737 F.2d 1254, 1261-62 (2d Cir. 1984) (applications
for leave to appeal may be denied where sanctioned litigant’s submissions do not show a departure
from history of vexatious litigation).
FOR THE COURT:
Thomas green, Acting C12
SAO-MAE