Free Letter - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

I UI
B 1 Case 3:03-cv-00681 —J BA Document 15 Filed 1 1/12/2003 Page 1 of 4
` U.S. Department of Justice I
1 §$§§%%
1 ‘ United States Attorney
I I L E D District of Connecticut f
BV Li. I [E ConnecticntFtnancir:l Center (203) 821-3 700 1
I C P ,,____,___ _` _ __ /57 Church Street
J.c.nswnu1C0uH1 ROBMIM4 macan7n4wr
N {Z W 11 AV B tl 1 C O H H, New Haven, Connecticut 065110 www. usd0j.gov/usao/ct
November 7, 2003
I BY HAND
Honorable Janet B. Arterton
United States District Judge
° United States Courthouse 1
141 Church Street
New Haven, CT 06510
Re: De Dampierre v. Ashcroft, et. al. 1
3:03CV681(JBA)
Dear Judge Arterton:
The Government respectfully submits this letter to notify 1
the Court that on October 24, 2003, an immigration judge ("IJ") denied j
petitioner Aymar De Dampierre's ("De Dampierre's") application for
cancellation of removal and De Dampierre was again order deported to
his native France. See Exhibit A. In addition, on October 28, 2003,
1 the IJ granted petitioner's motion to waive his right to appeal the
1 lJ's order. See Exhibit B. Consequently, De Dampierre now has a
final order of removal and is no longer being detained pursuant to INA
§ 236(c), 8 U.S.C. § 1226(c). See 8 U.S.C. § 1IO1(a)(47)(B)(Supp. Iv _
1998) (defining administratively final removal order). For the 1
reasons set forth in the Government's Memorandum of Law in Opposition 1
to the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus at pages 4—6, dated May 21, 1
2003, De Dampierre is now being detained pursuant to INA § 241, 8 1
U.S.C. § 1231. Accordingly, De Dampierre's claim of mandatory 1
detention under INA § 236(c) is now moot. Q
1
1
K 1
i 1
1 1
1
'

1 ' I
1 .
y Case 3:03-cv-00681-JBA Document 15 Fnled 11/12/2003 Page 2 of 4 {
Thank you for your consideration of this submission.; 1
1 Respectfully submitted,
Ksvim J. o · common
1 United States Attorney for the
, District of Connecticut
Attorney for Respondents
1 f/,// ” //;§?,4é;;;‘é ;;¢7'
By:
isnmn R. PATEL (CT—24433)
Assistant United States Attorney (
- 157 Church Street —- 23rd Floor
New Haven, Connecticut 06510
Telephone: (203) 821-3753
1
1 cc: Michael Boyle (by facsimile and regular mail)
Q Mark T. Kenmore (by facsimile and regular mail) i
1
1 1
A 1
1 1
1
1 1
z 1
1
E 1 The Government respectfully requests that the Court
; direct the Clerk of the Court to docket this letter so that it is 1
{ made a permanent part of the record in this matter. 1

I? /’ Case 3:03:6/-00681-JBA Document 15 Filed 11/12/2003 Page 3.0f;4» .» 3
V i
i IMMIGRATION COURT _ é
{ 450 MAIN ST., ROOM 509
HQRTFURD, CT Oé103*3015
§ the Hatter of
{ - _ Daze Nn.: &29—8ZB~6B3
DAHPIERRE, AYMGR
Hpspundant IN REMUUAL PROCEEDINGS
Q DRDER GF THE IMMIGRATION JUDGE
yis is a aummapy of the eral decision entered an Uct 24; 2003.
1:15 memorandum is sulply fur the convenience uf the parties. If the _
I·oueadings should be appealed or reopened, the oral decision will became
hp uificial opinion in the case. ”`— ‘
The- r‘B5P¤¥l¤&·n‘k Maas ordmwad ramuvwd from tho.? Uniied 5t¤iE€» U:
,_ I; ur in the ltprna iv .¤ |
I J Rasp¤ndent's application for voluntary departure ups danied and i
n rpwpundant HBS ordered removed tn
I alternative tu . __ _ N
§ 1 RE$PUDd@ht'G application for voluntary departure was granted until ` _
{ upcn pasting 3 baud in tha amount bf $ ___~._.ww.
1 with an alternate order of removal in `
T 3 R&sp0ndEnt‘9 application fav asylum was K }grant&d ( ldamied
i ( )mithdrawn.
3 J Rp¤pnndent's application fav withholding of removal was t }9rantau 2
i ( Jdwnied ( luithdraun. `
%>/G Rp5p0ndent's application fav cancellation u?‘?&m¤val under section
3 \= 240A i 1 Rpsp¤ndpnt’s application or cancellation uf removal was C 2 grantad .
§ under sactinn 24DA<1> { > granted under section 240¤£bE<2J
i ( 1 duniad < > withdrawn. If granted. it was ordered that the
g rpspundpnt be issued all apprupriate,¤0:umauts necessary to give
sffamt to This 0rQar._ - U l
i J Respondent 5 application far a uaiver under 5QC{10D d,,~“. of the INA was
{ ( Jgrauied ( Jdeuiad { Juithdramn ur ( bother.
1 3 Rmsp0ndant”s application far adju5tmeni of status under section ___*_,..
1 of the INA was { >gvantad { >danipd C Ewithuraun. I? granted, if
1 was ordered that respondent DE issued all spprppriate documents necassarv i
{ to give effect tn this urdpr. _ i
I Rasp0nd¤ht`5 status was vascinded under section 246.
{ 3 Respondent is admitted to the Uniieu States as a___....iunti1 ______,__. |
I 3 As a condition uf admission, respondent ia tu past a $ _,,_+km_ band.
I 3 Respmqdant knngingiy filed a Tr1vn1¤u§_¤§y1um application after proper
1 ndPicg.\ y jli. ;?° `{W`q;4 _ _-_(
I 3 Respondent mag advised of the limitation 0H}di5CPEt10hHP! re1iaf·fpr
1 failure tu appear as nruered in the Immigration Jud§B15_DTB1~dQ§$§1Bh. _
K 3 Proceedings were terminated. _ _ - nl! . 4 4
; J Dthare ,._n..,_*_,w.M,g;:l..Q-.“,M“_....,_.,?#/ ... .m_q__..Ey _
Date: Oct 24, 2 cas? ‘ `
appeal: waivadii%&?;;EE/,/} pea; Dug By; J B
I • \
i gq HIC •iu;L U. 9TR¢‘•U`§ ·
] f _ : j ' (3i§§Fratiun Juuga
@,5; iq W3 VW .. ; NL
i ,· . {“x { , ‘ ¤
i r/tM_ u tj Q 5
ExhibitA
H


z 1 » ~ · 1
1 1 Case 3:03-cv-00681-JBA Document 15 Filed 11/12/2003 Page 4 of 4 . I
11 1
u.s. nzpmrmznr or Justice .
1 1 Executive ¤r=i=ici; mn immiemriou Review
1 ummm sw-was immiermwnom courw _
1 HARTFORD, cr
1 · • 1
— I
1 in e Matter 0f ) _ AT REMQVAL
1 OIL ) IN DEPORTATION
1 1 V"¤0‘J` ‘L"’;P'1’ l`*"¢Z i AsYi.uM univ
1 Res pcndsnt ) 1 · EXCLUSION
File A (2,61 ‘%{`g/g` (b (F} y 1 1
Pnocaamuues
1 cause or me immienmow Juanes; 1 M l
1 T
1 of 1 12 ~
*6 G: P .9 M 1/MJL 5 VM 0 z ·¤ 14 `1`D
1 \ F -¤1MJ 11*6 Se f U 0 vx G 1179 ;
1 w"1#1W1 ` 1 FJ 1
1 ‘~ 1- ‘ Jap 1
1% gf:/v¤1-»g,y1_ [ALB ·Cc9°~1.F°1`—$ Ol/` I 1
"> L 5 1
1 ‘ t \ O/(
/2;*1 Emp " YLW `
1 ` 1
1 1 1
‘ ‘ 1
M BSI W. Straits
*2,, United States Immigration Judge 4
Q"` DOB _
1 Date
1 1

Certificate of Service
1 This dccumentwas served by: Mall {M) Personal Service (F') _
1 T0: [ Ihllen [ ] Alien cio Custodial Officer [ ]Allen’s AttyIRep [ ] Office of the
Date: By cqun Slgff: District Counsel, DHS 1
1 I E
1 1 1
1 A Exhibit B . 1
1 .