Free Notice - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

. .L..-.,i. `
_ . I
Case 3:03-cv-00676-WWE Document 11 Fnled O2/10/20(II¥€*O.E??=I9éI &00f*I|·I·C,
I
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT , 1e—= »¤ ;~»ps I
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT a` I i" J I
EMMANUEL SMITH. : II III IA Q] II] IF EI I
Petitioner, I 4g_Q;"j;IgyjD]{ I
* -{ Q H*YQ?IQ VI.
_ p V. : CASE NO. 3:O3CVOD67E·(PNC) I
: =PRISONER *
JOHN TARASCIO, et al., : I
I Defendant. I I
I
THIRD NOTICE TO PETITIONER
Petitioner is directed to file a second amended petition I
I
correcting the following errors in the amended petition: (1) The I
answer to Question 13(f) describes the issues raised in the I
prosecution's appeal of the trial judge's suppression of
evidence. Instead, it should describe the grounds on which I
petitioner is currently appealing his conviction. Questions ll I
to 16 refer to petitioner's appeal from the judgment of _
conviction. (2) Petitioner lists four grounds for habeas relief, I
I I
all of which refer to petitioner's sole exhausted ground for `
relief, which is his Fourth Amendment claim regarding an unlawful I
search and seizure. Petitioner should submit this claim as only I
one ground for relief.
So ordered. TE
. . {0 I
Dated at Hartford, Connecticut this day of February I
2004 . · / ` · I
|!"' ""Y \/\· -7 lf I
{ Robert N. Chaéig§§ |
I United States District Judge i
I
I
` ) !