Free Response - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

Case 3:03-cv-00644-CFD Document 299-5 Filed 06/O1/2007 Page 1 ef 2
pei •
jh •
<·I~

Case 3:03-cv-00644-CFD Document 299-5 Filed 06/O1/2007 Page 2 of 2
i
souace otatfott l
i · -·GliiJUP,lli{. `. l
T , '
i¢len1ims,lIliSD,SlPC .1. _ ___ _ i
r~¤s=2s stltlzttg i
December 12, 200] A ii ii { mm
Brian T. Conlin I
‘ Claims Analyst
AIG Technical Services, inc. -
N5 Water Street
New York, NY i0O3S
Re: Merit Capital Associates
. . i
t Dear Mr. Conlin:
Pursuant to your request, I have clone a thorough search ofour archived paperwork . I
Q found the power of` attorney you spoke otT As you can see, it is almost four years old. This
l ‘ power was never used. `]t was never renewed at the end ofthe year, as required by the
i rules. After the rewriting of our supervisory procedures in i999, coinciding with our
, purchase ofE&D insurance, all discretionary accounts were assigned a new number
‘ starting with the prefix 855. Since this was never a discretionary account, no new number -
was assigned to it. i
i
i As to the balance ofyou letter, I thought we answered that in our previous
correspondence. Mr. Soweii never complained to Merit regarding the handling ofhis
r account. The first time we heard of this complaint was the filing ofthe arbitration. There is
no correspondence with Mr. Sowell regarding complaints. There is no correspondence i
either to or from Merit Capital and Charter Financial Network, Novation Financial
E Corporation or Charter 3.
Please let me know ifyou need any additional information. n
Sincerely, __ _ , _
¤ g PLAINT}FF.$ l
i ,:,47; zfjétér Qi 8 EXHIBIT _.
- - ‘ ` = lr. ltp.5
Robert Fitzpat k ii, E 4 ; §
General Counsel { i`.‘ Q ~ _ _
Ators 0300
- l22l ips! Ruud [ust < Wasipurx, fl UéBB[l· EB3-S4}-3590- BDME2-EEE? · Pax 2El3~34¥·35i5