Free Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 70.0 kB
Pages: 3
Date: April 25, 2006
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 522 Words, 3,486 Characters
Page Size: 612.72 x 1008 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/23015/184.pdf

Download Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut ( 70.0 kB)


Preview Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut
i ·- - ~¢ Case 3:03-cv-00644-CFD Document 184 Filed O4/24/2006 Page 1 of 3
i i {:·.¤a»r, H i
E { . ` ‘· '
[ 2 (gif!)/? j
I < . , . if 3 7
A if ‘..`a;·, 1.-a .
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ' V e"a-’'.· r _a`’ j -‘‘‘ `A ’° ’
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT o i
E 1
j BRUCE CHARLES RYAN, RUSSELL WILLIAM )
NEWTON, ROBERT F ITZPATRICK, and MERIT ) CIVIL ACTION NO.
i CAPITOL ASSOCIATES, INC. ) 3:03 CV 00644 (CFD)
I Plaintiffs, )
( )
I )
vs. )
)
NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE )
COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA., and )
` AIG TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC., )
i Defendants )
I )
DAVID W. GWYNN and RAQUEL GWYNN ) CIVIL ACTION NO. t
Plaintiffs, ) 3:03 CV 01154 (CFD) i
. ) {
)
vs. )
)
E NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE )
COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA., and ) t
AIG TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC., ) i
Defendants )
_ I April 20, 2006
E A PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO l
DEFENDANTS’ FIRST REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS
The Plaintiffs David W. Gwymi and Raquel Gwynn (“the Gwynn plaintiffs"), through
counsel, hereby respectfully move pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b) and Local Rule 7(`b)( 1) for an
1
i i extension of time of fourteen (14) days to and including May 5, 2006, to respond to defendants’
l First Request for Admissions. In support of this motion, tmdersigned counsel states as follows:

· 1
. ( (
1
1 a

4 I 4 rrrr — ~~ V ~—— ~···•··-•-••-•-•L·——;···**···' ""’ '—°_°-° ' L-" ._ -I-“._“-“T ’-V
· . · Case 3:03-cv-00644-CFD Document 184 Filed O4/24/2006 Page 2 of 3 I
I I
I I
I
I
I
I I
I I 1. This is the second request for extension of time made by the Gwynn plaintiffs
; with respect to this time limitation.
2. Defendants have tiled 137 separate requests for admission, many of which
I I
I reference documents which must be reviewed prior to responding.
I
. I 3. Counsel to defendants in this case and counsel to co-plaintiffs do not object to the
E I
I 1'CC[LlCSIZCd CXlZCI'1SlOl'l. I
I Accordingly, for the above—stated reasons, the Gywrm plaintiffs respectfully request that I
I
{ this court grant an extension of time to and including May 5, 2006 for plaintiffs to respond to I
defendants’ First Request for Admissions. I
I
I
. PLAINTIFFS, mivrn Gwynn and »
I RAQUEL Gwynn
. By_ ""
I Mario DiNatale (ct 12449)
I Silver Golub & Teitell, LLP I
‘ 184 Atlantic Street
I Stamford, CT 06904
(203) 325-4491
I (203) 325-3769 (Fax)
[email protected]
I
I
I I I

_ __... - 1.. .. . M._aM.....4.m.; -j- —··-;————— ““““· ·——-*'“““**'**‘*’”'_**-*I
; . » Case 3:03-cv-00644-CFD Document 184 Filed O4/24/2006 Page 3 of 3 I
L l

. l )
g l CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE _
· l THIS IS TO CERTIFY that a copy ofthe foregoing was sent via U.S. Mail, postage
prepaid, on this 20’}‘ day of April, 2006, to:
_ I Mark B. Seiger, Esq.
i Charles F. Gfeller, Esq.
Edwards Angell Palmer & Dodge LLP
90 State House Square
· Hartford, CT 06103
E Peter M. Nolin, Esq.
; Stephanie McLaughlin, Esq.
. Sandak Hem1essey & Greco LLP
707 Summer Street
. Stamford, CT 06905
g l MARIO DiNATALE
A l
l
l