Free Memorandum in Opposition to Motion - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

-;..T...m-~————————·-·—-—~··;"rrr*""‘—“"““*"‘—`;“““`"" `l
Case 3:03-cv-00630-DJS Document 40-3) Filed 10/1%2003 1 (11 1 I }n P
Ctll`l"lpi.1lL‘t’ $Cl•.?ll<'Uri C.ll}C5l"i11ll)(1 T-: mum. ICL/lk.
'·‘·'·V\\·.t?Fi•.`.·.`lltEl ‘·°*-’kl ‘·
it t., `
-_5O..g,_;_ March 19.200lCil·;l’ ` F·U-l)U‘-ME"`
To: Mario Richards H
From: Robin Beebe _ J
Subject: Final Written Warning _ Q
T l
In accordance with CSC Policy #207 (Employee Conduct), this Final Written Wamirlg is `
delivered to advise you of your unsatisfactory conduct with regard to employee conduct.
After full assessment of the facts and determining the seriousness of the situation, it was l
determined that a Final Written Warning would serve to delineate the problem areas and i
p to again explain work conduct as it relates to work expectations. ,
:
¤g¤|¤ On numerous occasions, you have been informed about your inappropriate conduct in the
¤¤" workplace. Your actions constitute a violation of CSC’s policy; specifically, 4.1.1
Inability or unwillingness to work harmoniously with others and 4.1.15 Outrageous
behavior. These issues have been brought to your attention without improvement.
Examples of this behavior are as follows: r `
• Shouting at fellow co—worker in January 2001. You were verbally
counseled after this incident to retrame from this type of behavior.
• Shooting at a fellow co-worker in February 2001. Again, you were _ -
verbally counseled about your conduct in the workplace. Q
• A Inappropriate behavior during a conference call with a customer on March E
15, 2001. You were verbally counseled after this incident.
• You were verbally counseled by your Team Lead on March 16, 2001, who
. was advising you to review the telephone queue to meet customer SLA."s. L
i You became argumentative with your Team Lead about CSS queue I
- ` procedures. i l
• Became argumentative with a fellow co—worker regarding computer i
resources on March I6, 2001. You were verbally counseled by your Team _ E
_ Lead regarding appropriate behavior in the workplace yet you continued to
_ be argumentative with this fellow. co—worker and threatened him with the · _ \
alms :“l’l1 <=l¤¤l<¤ r9_v3_,,9y2tf’; .,_...._.,_..____ _ ,_.__._., _- .._..._.._ ._.. . ._.., _ _..__ . ...,.._.... ............ - ....... ........ .. ...... . ........ it ....... ..,... . ...,..t. . iit. ...... - ....... .. .... ....
Effective immediately, it is expected that you will abide by CSC’s policy regarding
Employee Conduct and will not create a disruptive work environment. It is the
expectation of CSC that you will present yourself in a professional manner. Any further ,
incidents of this nature will result in the immediate termination of employment from J i i
csc. ¤ 3./ E // . Q@,.,,_,»7" ‘ L»2»2‘- ¤<.¤:Z{~ &CLi·-·{ZF,L~ xy' p
AL 5d¤>=/""", . · » E/¢2··=~é’£ i
Sr. Supervisor Date • r · _ Date _ - ,
' ’- ge; {{...7.* ·(· ` _ " I i
»»r of · :-/~e s
Manager ` g Date l
Enclosure: n l—lR.N1P i‘20? —· Employee Conduct _
Copy to: Employee File ` _ l
- i Human Resources CSC4`}00004
- Teclinulogy Manageiiicnt Group l
iiltl vi‘iiiiii·in-l•.~n ltiiini W
V %>{iirwi·.li. C[imi= : wi llliiiitl —"—"";.
:t·e..;;. 5.;. 5. a_;;t`g;;§_;Fj· Za 2*5 5:-sie a—>:#e=e<¢ :--s e »··-· ge-».;
V ·- · -·-—~+==¤~—¥~i<*=~>’-»’>··>»·¤—·>*.v-to-tssaae;.iéci5eri;Hz:awwwwssrtséi-t-’~5¥~A=§¤.%%·.=:¤&*:¤e*¢éés·=¤¤a=-·-==—·~·—··~ ·--» e~ -
,;=·:..xr..<5-Q}JL}:airseQ».¤é}4.ot.=.¢.a:£»t¢.%i;sttat2¤¤r:r*»¤¤¤=‘=’*-‘rt-:*·* ‘’‘· T ‘‘‘. tj , . _ .... t ....r_ ._.. i .... i fi- ..’‘ I·1Ff-Si"-`f’ -r’· ‘?”~‘*i ‘‘`‘ i·"· ·‘`·
$+:1 5. 5. Eat':-s ei:-se<·e==<: L--e » we