Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

I —
I Case 3:03-cv-01045-WWE Document 12 Filed 02/13/2004 !’?”l€ ICIQKICI I
I r ra O O I
I UNITED STATES msrnrcr counr 'e·” gi IQI
I DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

WILLIAM LAPUT ; ZIIUII III} I 2 A II* UCI
‘ I I I
I Plaintiff, : crv1L Al¢IJtIrQN.No. I ,
1 : 3:03CV1045(WWE) -6 I
I "· i I
· LARKIN ENTERPRISES INC. :
i I
{ J Defendant. : FEBRUARY 10, 2004 J
I I y MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME i
_ L The Plaintiff, William Laput, ("Plaintiff Laput"), pursuant to Local Rule
( z gi" _ ,
*94 O E \ of Crvil Procedure 7(b) hereby requests an extension of time of two (2) weeks from
(A I
g §T February 14, 2004 up to and including March 1, 2004, to respond to the Defendant,
cb ` I
§ Larkin Enterprises, Inc.’s (“Defendant Larkin") Second Set of interrogatories dated
*§· e I
E E January 14, 2004 and Second Request for Production dated January 14, 2004. In support I
:-1 ‘
K g hereof Plaintiff Laput represents as follows:
I
l. On February 9, 2004 Plaintiff’ s counsel Michael Satti underwent a spinal
I
I
fusion and removal of a cervical disc and will be unable to work for approximately two
I
(2) vieeks and is prohibited from driving for one (1) month. I
I
[
5=T`I`If. Ai 2. As a result ofthe undersigned is attempting to cover both Attorney Satti's and P
I {I I I
FI .· ~— .
" ll`' { her tiles in his absence and this extension is necessary to enable her to properly respond 1
to discoyery requests. I
gg rtt Q
ORWAL NRGUMENT NOT REQUESTED
I
TESTIMONY NOT REQUIRED N
I
I