Free Order - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

I
I Case 3:03-cv-01032-SRU Document 28 Filed O3/O3/2004 Page 1 of 2 p
I I
I
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURF E D
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
. I : 0
A IIUDNMAR-3 P50
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ; WT CGW., I
; U5 DISTR _ . .,9*
v. ; c1v.A¤BlB-IBIQEPORI I"
: 3:03C\/1032 (SRU)
62 CUTLER ST., ET AL. :
E
ORDER RE: STATUS I
I On or before March 23, 2004, the parties shall file with the Clerk at Bridgeport a joint I
I
I
status report setting forth responses to the questions set forth below (it is not necessary for the
parties to recite the questions in their report). If the parties disagree with respect to an answer,
set forth the different responses. A courtesy copy ofthe report, both in hard copy and on a 3.5**
computer diskette (in WordPerfect format), shall be submitted to Chambers.
A. OVERVIEW OF THE CASE
I. Briefly describe the nature of this matter, the relief requested, and any relationship
this case may have to other pending actions. I
2. Provide a concise summary of disputed issues of fact and law. I
I
3. Briefly describe what discovery has been taken to date. Is discovery completed? I
If not, how much additional time is needed and what additional discovery is
necessary? Will there be a request for a modification ofthe Scheduling Order? If
so, what will be the request? I
4. What do the parties believe that the Court can do to facilitate the resolution of this I
case?
B. SETTLEMENT
l. The parties are directed to discuss settlement in good faith and to certify that they
have done so since the issuance of this order.
2. When was the last settlement conference and who conducted it? Are there any l

I

1 I -n-—_——_“—_m__——m_`l
i Case 3:03-cv-01032-SRU Document 28 Filed O3/O3/2004 Page 2 of 2 l
l
l
l
l I
outstanding reports due the person conducting the settlement conference?
3 3. Do the parties believe a settlement conference or assignment to a special master I
` would be beneficial at this time? If not, explain what additional discovery or t
; motion practice is necessary to facilitate settlement discussions. I
l
C. TRIAL PREPARATION
l l. When will the case be ready for trial?
2. What additional preparation, other than that previously discussed, is required?
3. Are there additional pleadings to be filed? If so, identify them.
It is so ordered.
l
Dated at Bridgeport this 3*d day of March, 2004.
4/'•.(. . -4 Ad !
tef _ R. Underhill
United States District Judge i
L
l
l
l
l
I