Free Order - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 24.3 kB
Pages: 2
Date: December 1, 2004
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 324 Words, 2,043 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/22928/43.pdf

Download Order - District Court of Connecticut ( 24.3 kB)


Preview Order - District Court of Connecticut
Case 3:03-cv-00998-JGM

Document 43

Filed 12/01/2004

Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT ------------------------------------------------x : SANTIAGO E. CARTEGENA : : V. : : THAMES VALLEY WATER : : ------------------------------------------------x ORDER

3:03 CV 998 (JGM)

DATE: DEC. 1, 2004

On October 25, 2004, plaintiff's counsel filed a Motion to Withdraw Appearance (Dkt. #38), with a copy to plaintiff. Local Rule 7(e) (formally Local Rule 15) provides: Withdrawal of appearances may be accomplished only by leave of Court on motion duly noticed, and normally shall not be granted except upon a showing that other counsel has appeared or that the party has elected to proceed pro se, and that the party whose counsel seeks to withdraw has received actual notice by personal service or by certified mail of the motion to withdraw. In cases where the party has failed to engage other counsel or file a pro se appearance, where good cause exists for permitting the withdrawal by the appearing counsel, the Court may grant the motion to withdraw the appearance after notice to the party that failure to either engage successor counsel or file a pro se appearance will result in the granting of the motion to withdraw and may result in a dismissal or default being entered against the party. Plaintiff is hereby warned that on or before December 17, 2004, plaintiff must have substitute counsel file his or her appearance, or plaintiff is to file a pro se appearance. If plaintiff fails to engage other counsel or file a pro se appearance by December 17, 2004, the Court will grant Attorney Bucci's Motion to Withdraw if it finds that "good cause exists for permitting the withdrawal by the appearing counsel," which could ultimately result in a dismissal of plaintiff's action. Dated at New Haven, Connecticut, this 1st day of December, 2004. ________/s/______________ Joan Glazer Margolis United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:03-cv-00998-JGM

Document 43

Filed 12/01/2004

Page 2 of 2