Free Order - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

A ·—————n4—-—~—»·—-.»--t·——.....| —-—-“—‘4
y _ Case 3:03-cv-0097Q,-JCH Document 12 Filed 11/12/2003 Page 1 of .1
‘ l · ( ,4
A . _} li ‘
M sa l>?>©~¥°\_IQ -Z-1QQl` Qt
O UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT g it D
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT i ll L.... s... - I
JESUS ROSA ) CASE NO. , i
g J PLAINTIFF ) 3:03CV00979(.}C NOV I O F) l2 33
) ·.·-·; i x‘~‘ |'*~." Pll--
) 26m REPORT or 5 Qin 2 ;_§;b_1r__ eqiii ip;
p V- , ) PARTIES, PLANNING Blain U .; . ’ is it l * -.A» E
. ) MEETING ’
HARTE NISSAN, INC., )
. DEFENDANT )
. ) November fl , 2003
i Date Complaint Filed: June 2, 2003.
1
Date Complaint Served: The defendant, Harte Nissan, Inc. (“Harte Nissan") was duly
Z T served on June 5, 2003.
t Date of Defendants Appearance: William J. McGrath appeared for Harte Nissan on June i
El an ¤no3_ y
n Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P l6(b), 26(i) and D. Conn. L. Civ. R. 38, a conference was held on i
t · 30, 2003. The participants were:
mm i E
_ QQ Sarah Poriss for the plaintiff Jesus Rosa.
ji j x` _.
° A __ Wqgliam J. McGrath for the defendant Harte Nissan.
\><· WS, Q —- P M ' l
"'* , cn . - 1
2 § .`_€?f£i;tiiication
§ 1 ig N ¢‘~..eia> J . . . . . .
g , E _ yu Hndersigned counsel certify that, after Consultatron with their clients, they have discussed the
. t.. ~ :~ I __·*
E La 3 —»t· 5 J
E lg gigd basis gif the parties' claims and defenses and any possibilities for achieving a prompt scftlemenr
E 2 E3 <.».» ·*?=€¤ p
Q i gg If :
ig lg fax resolution of the case and in consultation with their clients, have developed the following R
5 te r=¤ Q
E. ‘ E E M ‘——
:3 EJ § d case management plan. Counsel further certify that they have forwarded a copy of their report
O T) O ·——.
O, ` »—<
M l-E 2 § clients.
i II. Jurisdiction
A A. Subject Matter Jurisdiction: 15 U.S.C. §l640(e), 28 U.S.C. §l33l §l337, and Fed.
i R. cw. P. l8(a).
f l
C l x i
. _-_ ,
as