Free Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 8.5 kB
Pages: 2
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 425 Words, 2,724 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/22902/22.pdf

Download Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut ( 8.5 kB)


Preview Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut
Case 3:03-cv-00972-JCH

Document 22

Filed 01/13/2004

Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY, Plaintiff, VS. GE FANUC AUTOMATION CORPORATION, Defendant. : : : : : : : : :

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:03cv972 (JCH)

January 12, 2004

JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

The undersigned counsel for Plaintiff, Otis Elevator Company ("Otis") and Defendant, GE Fanuc Automation Corporation ("GE Fanuc"), hereby jointly request a postponement of the oral argument on Otis' Petition to Compel Arbitration ("Petition"), currently scheduled for January 26, 2004, for a period of approximately one month. The reason for this request is that Otis would like to depose William Zitelli, a former GE Fanuc employee who resides in Pennsylvania and GE Fanuc would like to depose Robert Gaboury, a former Otis employee who has recently begun new employment. These witnesses have indicated their willingness to cooperate and submit to depositions, but they are not available until early February, due to preexisting commitments. Counsel for Otis and GE Fanuc believe that these depositions will allow them to present a complete evidentiary record at the time of a hearing on Otis' Petition. Although certain affidavits have been filed as exhibits to memoranda in support of and in opposition to Otis' Petition to Compel Arbitration, the parties believe that depositions of Mr. Zitelli and Mr. Gaboury will delve into the issues of this dispute, i.e., whether there was an agreement to

Case 3:03-cv-00972-JCH

Document 22

Filed 01/13/2004

Page 2 of 2

arbitrate. By the same token, deposing the two key witnesses in this dispute may allow each party to assess the strengths and weaknesses of its position and thereby facilitate resolution of the case. Moreover, the parties have previously agreed to advance the above-captioned action along the same time frame as the action entitled GE Fanuc Automation Corporation v. POMA-Otis Transportation System, d/b/a/ Otis Elevator Company, Civil Action No. 3:03CV1321(JCH), also pending before this Court. WHEREFORE, the parties respectfully request that the Court grant their joint request to postpone the January 26, 2004 hearing to allow these two depositions to take place.

Dated: January 12, 2004 ________________________________ Daniel L. FitzMaurice (ct 05331) [email protected] Maureen O'Connor (ct 22530) [email protected] Day, Berry & Howard LLP CityPlace I Hartford, CT 06103-3499 Counsel for Plaintiff Dated: January 12, 2004 ________________________________ Charles P. Reed (ct 07750) [email protected] John F. Conway (ct 04763) [email protected] Loughlin FitzGerald 150 South Main Street Wallingford, CT 06492 Counsel for Defendant

-2-