Free Response - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 64.9 kB
Pages: 4
Date: February 19, 2004
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 421 Words, 2,559 Characters
Page Size: 612.72 x 1008 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/22898/56.pdf

Download Response - District Court of Connecticut ( 64.9 kB)


Preview Response - District Court of Connecticut
i `—`“"”"` ¤
I Oase 3:03-cv—0096€;%VIG Document 56 Filed 02/18/2004 Page 1 of 4
l I il? I
l
I
I
Ziiiili IIB I El I?) Q? Bb I
UNITED STATES DISTRICT coonr .%,5; . IEQI I \e‘. j Sit'?
DISTRICT os CONNECTICUT .li I >· M. 5 - M I-
I
THOMAS MATYASOVSZKY OH behalf l
of himself and all other
similarly situated
_ , aa
Pla1nt1fE CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:03 CV 968 (WIG) '
V— l
I
HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY FEBRUARY I6, 2004
OF BRIDGEPORT, ET AL.
Defendants.
OBJECTION TO JOSEPH AND SANDRA PELLECHIO’S MOTION TO INTERVENE
I
The undersigned Defendants, hereby object to JOSEPH AND SANDRA PELLECHIO’S l
Motion to Intervene into the above captioned matter, pursuant to FRCP § 24(b), on the grounds
that the proposed Motion to Intervene is untimely, will cause undue delay in the resolution of this
matter and prejudice the rights of the Defendants. Further, the proposed intervenors will not j
substantially contribute to the development of the underlying factual basis for the suit or to the
just and equitable adjudication of the legal issues presented. Finally, the would—be intervenors’
interests are adequately protected by the parties in the underlying action. Accordingly, the
Motion to Intervene should be denied.
The Defendants submit the attached Memorandum of Law in Opposition to the Motion to
Intervene.
i
!

I
, . Case 3:03-cv-OO96@IG Document 56 Filed O2/1&55004 Page 2 of 4 I
THE DEFENDANTS, I
HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF
B I Brom, et 31. I
BY I
James A. Mahar, Esq. I
Ryan, Ryan, Johnson & Dcluca, LLP I
, 80 Fourth Street, P.O. Box 3057
Stamford, CT 06905 E
Juris No. 52525
Phone No. 203-3 57-9200
!
{

Case 3:03-cv—OO96€jV|G Document 56 Filed O2/18/@004 Page 3 of 4 [
O n
!
K
ORDER [
The foregoing, having been heard and considered bythe court, it is hereby ORDERED:
SUSTAINED/OVERRULED. E
BY THE COURT: i
Judge/Assistant Clerk l
Date:_
1

i
- 3 - l
I
_|

N Case 3:03-cv—OO96§·\%lIG Document 56 Filed O2/18/2004 Page 4 of 4
. A L)
1
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE K
I hereby certify that on February , 2004, a copy ofthe above was mailed to the
following counsel and pro se parties of record: i
Alan Rosner, Esq.
Law Offices of Alan Rosner
1115 Main Street, Suite 415
Bridgeport, CT 06604
Attomey for Plaintiff Thomas Matyasovszky, on Behalf of Plaintiff Class

1
A. Mahar,
1
1
I:\I’m¤nsns\1742.D()7\objt0|r10li.|1te1'vc11cpc11icliio.wpd 1
1742.007 l
` I
, 4 -
1