Free Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 63.3 kB
Pages: 3
Date: November 3, 2003
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 466 Words, 2,773 Characters
Page Size: 612.72 x 1008 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/22898/23.pdf

Download Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut ( 63.3 kB)


Preview Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut

· ’ Case 3:03-cv—OO96&&\§V IG Document 23 Filed 10/30@)O3 Page 1 of 3
l
`A.a,
i fit!] {Jill QE? 0 £??`~’ J: 3 jg
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT =‘. 2 IILP Ir;
DISTRICT or CONNECTICUT I A { E M"; `" {
i THOMAS MATYASOVSZKY on behalf :
l of himselfland all other ;
i similarly situated :
Plaintitt CIVIL ACTION No. S;0S Cv ess (RNC) i
v. Q I
HOUSING AUTHORITY or THE CITY I
or Biuoosroxr, ET AL. ;
Defendants. -
l
MOTION Fon EXTENSION or TIME TO RESPOND TO PLA]NTIFF’S FIRST 5
REQUESTS Fon PRODUCTION
The undersigned Defendants, Housing Authority of the City of Bridgeport, Collin Vice, I
and Jonas DeGuzman, respectfully move this Court, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 34 and
D. Conn. Loc. R. Civ. Rule 7 for a thirty day extension of time to respond to the Plaintiffs First I
Requests for Production. The Plaintiffs First Requests for Production was served on the i
Defendants on October 13, 2003 and consists of eight production requests. The additional time {
is required to gather and review the requested information.
In support of this motion, the undersigned represents that on October 28, 2003, he spoke, i
via telephone, with Attorney Jennifer Vickery, counsel for the Plaintiff. Attorney Vickery
indicated that she objects to an extension of time. This is the iirst motion for extension of time
l
Il


l I Case 3:03-cv—OO96 — IG Document 23 Filed 10/30 O3 Page 2 of 3
, ill {3
the Defendants have tiled regarding the Plaintift”s First Requests for Production dated October
i 13,2003. P q
l WHEREFORE, the Defendants respectfully move that the Court allow an additional I
thirty days to Friday, December 12, 2003 for the Defendants to respond to the Plaintiff s First
l
Requests for Production. I)
THE DEFENDANTS, C
HOUSING AUTHORHY or THE CITY on
BRIDGEPORT
ames A. Mahar, Esq., (CT 21854) `
Ryan, Ryan, Johnson & Deluca, LLP
·‘ 80 Fourth Street, P.O. Box 3057
Stamford, CT 06905
Juris No. 52525 g
Phone No. 203-357-9200
l

l
l
- 2 -
l

` Case 3:03-cv—OO96@|G Document 23 Filed 10/3062503 Page 3 of 3
1
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
R I hereby certify that on October Zi, 2003, a copy ofthe above was mailed to the
following counsel and pro se parties of record:
I Alan Rosner, Esq. `
Law Offices of Alan Rosner
p 1115 Main Street, Suite 415 1
p Bridgeport, CT 06604
p Attorney for Plaintiff] Thomas Matyasovszky, on Behalf of Plaintiff Class
Jennifer Vickery, Esq. 1
Law Offices of Alan Rosner
1115 Main Street, Suite 415
· Bridgeport, CT 06604
Attorney for Plaintiff, Thomas Matyasovszky, on Behalf of Plaintiff Class
James A. Mahar, Ejsq.
1:\Pmcases\1'M2.007\u1otxtdttmc102803.wpd ·
1742.007 =
1
1
1
- 3 -
1
I
1