Free Order on Motion for Default Judgment - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 49.6 kB
Pages: 1
Date: March 10, 2004
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 439 Words, 2,525 Characters
Page Size: 612.72 x 1008 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/22859/33.pdf

Download Order on Motion for Default Judgment - District Court of Connecticut ( 49.6 kB)


Preview Order on Motion for Default Judgment - District Court of Connecticut
, Case 3:03-cv-00929-AWT Document 33 Filed O3/O9/2fQg4C Qojntp 5 O/6
o st cn · .
Ll Ti *+4 »— >~»
4J cu ¤+-i to G
QJ L'. I ru `
EMEEE i
§ B EF r E
ataat (
M gg é S °s' UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2 SL 5 sr DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
E EQ C; ti §` a ,
E A 5 *5 NICHOLAS SICINOLFI and 1
'gj gl E 8 § THE NICHOLAS-JAMES COMPANY 1
'° E U ' Plaintiffs ( ·
ll—i O Q (M , .
(U O in Q ,
PO .,.4 Cl) .
“’ B 43 gl `E v. 2
$ G, Q _ éj I CIVIL ACTION NO.:
E ig Q Q'} '° TOWN OF TRUMBULL 2 303 CV 929 (AWT)
M "* Tg Jig MARLIN LIVELY ( 1 QKW
~ °” w ANNE Moose ·
rj -I-’ .L' M .
O Q ·*·’ rp
o g L -0 RICHARD BERNARD and :
¤> C ri JJ Q] CHRISTOPHER PAOLETI ‘
4: ¤> G ,; · ·
P {E 3 ud 0 Ei Defendants. : January 21 2004
P U oi U Lé] 3
VU '· Q •-I Dj l
E (I) sr .,.| ···-I O
+1 _Q ¢·-I '_| 5
jj 3 5 Z E, 3 DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR DEFAULT T
m {U ig H, ii
ru PQ o cs _
$1* P § E 3 ig; Pursuant to Rule 37 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the individual defendants,
s.; 4-i GJ ‘
Cj O rg JJ
E lg E Q1 if E Anne Moore, Marlin Lively, Richard Bernard and Christopher Paoleti, hereby move this Court
e e ,3* ;¤ ¤ _=¤
Q; E g 2 E 5 to enter the following orders for the Plaintiffs’ failure to respond to discovery: (1) a default
(U -•-¤ -r—i {U
LH U JZ
S g Fg QE against the Plaintiffs, Nicholas Sicnolti and the Nicholas-James Company; (2) an Order
“’ O fi Dr E
fi C] E. E E E _ providing that Nicholas Sicinolii be precluded from giving testimony, whether by affidavit or
. W ld ru or u '
-. I
gg ui gi 3 gi 1- , I in person, directed to the topics addressed in the Defendants’ discovery requests; and (3) an
4.) U) U) [_) I .
.5 § gi fl 3 EI _ ;)rder requiring the Plaintiffs to pay the reasonable attorneys fees incurred in presenting this
Ul CU I E` .
g fg gg I" TTI
ig; E E g i ' ,.QRAL?ARGUMENT REQUESTED
4; § W {54 ‘ l, , ESTIII/IONY NOT REQUIRED
I-4 -I-T _w II- l-rr A--I .u T ` ':
ru r—i GJ .-El J, ~ n , ·
‘
r:;_|u:>_?£ r g
'H ~·—· E3 ti A
cneoolill . E
Lv.] M M qi r . ji w ···~ i
Eiiiii-i·—i;; ·_;‘fE©_.V;
Z ·v-I GJ ·—I 4.: 4J . ( ‘·-a .
g cu 4J m zu · m __
·—| C2 JZ! M JZ} O ·——` .. ..,..
LD {1.-ri cc nl 4.» Q ro
Cliff
llnl