Free Answer to Complaint - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

I A ACDC- Case 3:03-cv-00925-QFD D¤cumehfI4“_·Filed 04/27/2004 Page 1 0f 3 mw-__—_~I
. C.,) U I
, I
M UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT or CONNECTICUT
DIRECTV, INC., )
Plaintiff I
v. i Civil Action 3:03C\/0925-CFD
>
>
ORLANDO GARCIA, )
Defendant I
ANSWER ANI) JURY DEMAND
COMES NOW the defendant, through counsel undersigned, and answering the
plaintiffs complaint states:
1. Defendant lacks sufficient information to admit or deny the allegations of paragraph 1,
and therefore denies same.
2. Defendant denies the allegations of paragraph 2.
3. Defendant admits the allegations of paragraphs 3 and 4.
4. Defendant lacks sufficient information to admit or deny the allegations of paragraphs
5 — ll, and therefore denies same.
5. Defendant denies the allegations of paragraphs 12 — 22.
6. In FCSIJOHSG to p£1I`EigI`7:lpl'1 23, Cl€f61’1dE11'1lZ restates l'€S])OI'1S€S to p211`&gI`Ei.pl'1S l —
7. Defendant denies the allegations of paragraphs 24 —~ 29.
8. In response to paragraph 30, defendant restates his answer to paragraphs 1 — 29.
9. Defendant denies the allegations of paragraphs 31 — 36.
10. In response to paragraph 37, defendant restates his answer to paragraphs 1 —— 36. I
I
I
I
I

` Case 3:03-cv-0092%% D Document 14 Filed O4/2%2904 Page 2 of 3 jl
_ ~ l
ll. Defendant denies the allegations of paragraphs 38 — 43. I
12. In response to paragraph 44, defendant restates his answer to paragraphs 1 — 43. l
13. Defendant denies the allegations of paragraphs 45 — 49.
First Affirmative Defense
The complaint fails to state a claim upon which reiief can be granted.
_ Second Affirmative Defense
Any and all claims asserted in the complaint are barred by the relevant statutes of
limitations.
Third Affirmative Defense I
Plaintiffs claims are barred by estoppel.
Fourth Affirmative Defense
Plaintiffs claims are barred by laches.
Fifth Affirmative Defense
Plaintiffs claims are barred by its failure and refusal to mitigate damages. g
Sixth Affirmative Defense
Plaintiff lacks standing to bring the instant action.
WHEREFORE, defendant prays that this Honorable Court dismiss the complaint,
award defendant attorney’s fees and costs of suit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1927, and award
defendant such additional relief as the Court shall deem just and proper.
_.]@|)EMAND
Defendant requests trial by jury on all issues and claims so triable.
2
l

J Case 3:03-cv-OOQZTCF D Document 14 Filed O4/27(2Z)O4 Page 3 of 3
Kenneth D. Quat
BBo#4¤s64o
9 Damonmill Square, Suite 4A—4
Concord MA 01742
9-:8-369-0sta
9vs-:m-2296 (ax)
or sa #24512
Connecticut address pursuant to Local Rule 83.l(c):
Mirto, Ketaineck, Barrett & DiCr0sta, P.C.
P.O. Box 428
West Haven CT 06516
Certificate of Service
I hereby certify that a copy ofthe foregoing; has been served on plaintiff s counsel by
mailing same via first class mail, postage prepaid, to John M. McLaughlin, Esquire,
McLaughlin Sacks LLC, 31 Trtunbull Rd., Northarnpt n O .
4/me l
Dated: vi 0 M