Free Order - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

l P ` ~ - _,»,..t((»a -·
l - ·Case 3:03-cv-00916%/C Document8 Filed O3/31/@4 Page1<>f`"1\l K J
(\ _ _ T ,
( o - i E
( l
g 21 » · ~-1 (
l l
' UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT , .
r DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT ‘
l
( DIRECTV, Inc. ) =
y ) CIVIL ACTION
Plaintiff, ) NO. 303cv916 AVC
i > WC i
{ VS- ) RULE 26(i) REPORT OF THE PARTIES’ g
( Gmac Lyuch g PLANNING MEETING (
Defendant )

RULE 26{Q REPORT OF THE PARTIES’ PLANNING MEETING (
. . l
Date Complaint Filed: 05/23/2003
I
_ Date Complaint Served: 7/27/03 I
Date ofDefendant’s Appearance: 10/2/O3
(
i
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. l6(b), 26(l`) and D. Conn. L. Civ. R. 16, Plaintiffs counsel called
3:03CV916(AVC) . March 31, 2004. Construed as a motion to modify i
the scheduling order currently in place, the motion is GRANTED as (
follows: (1) A11 discovery, including depositions of all (
¤ witnesses,. shall be completed by May 6, 2004; (2) all motions, ll `
except motions in limine incident to a trial, shall be filed on
or before June 6, 2004; (3) the parties shall file a joint trial ¤
‘ memorandum in accordance with the pretrial order, which order '
shall accompany the jury selection calendar, and be sent to the
parties on July 6, .2004; and (4) the case shall be ready for -
trial by August 6, .;.2(0d0i4._ It is further hereby ORDERED that the Q
parties shall have to `and including April 20, 2004, to file a i
joint report of th§e_J·parties planning meeting as required pursuant
to Local Rule 16 and“2€.le)';: ._,,,Eai1ure to participate in such a
planning meeting may resu1t°fri=7$§nctions. See Conn. L. R. Civ. i
P- Milf)- :"°==-~,,._ -• A ‘ A- A A
{ so ORDERED. A
. sigma vi Cessna; \
I- United States District Judge
l
X l
tlsa »soaoore o
N r o r tstossoe