Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

i .· Case 3:03-cv—0O6{6)AWT Document 26 Filed 03€%2004 P%I(;¤[;llC¢/*"¢z€f’
1 _ & —-~ —-
gi ,
i E UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FI Q _
§ _ DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT Z “ ’
5 UH!] MA
i KELLY WOFFORD, _ H I 5 A I]; U 3 I
A Plaintiff} U. 3 W3- , I
4}: Case . 303CV06:l=6;*{2fg§@'li,%§;,!_ gtgxgpr
m V. ` · LJ, I
Q Mama 1 , 2004
E. WEBSTER FINANCIAL CORPORATION et al., i
y %’ Defendants. p i
. 3 A ‘
E MOTION TO EXTEND TIME
L; l. Plaintiff hereby moves for an extension of time until 30 clays after a settlement conference to
H
4% respond or object to the discovery request dated October 9, 2003 of Defendant CONTINENTAL
U
O
Q1 CASUALTY COMPANY. i
5 I
g 2. Plaintiff s counsel has inquired of said DefE:ndant’s counsel, Darren E. Sinofsky, and there is {
>1
E agreement to the motion.
Z3
3 3. Two previous motions for extension of time filed by Plaintiff were granted combined until .
4-I
March 15, 2004. i
JJ H 4
G 3 j
8 '6‘ 4. In the Report of Parties’ Planning Meeting, Paragraph V.C.l ., the parties certified that they
5 O
5 .':.‘ . considered the desirability of attempting to settle the case before undertaking significant *
Er JJ
B . discover or motion practice and, in Paragraph V.C.3, agreed to a settlement conference with a
u N y
u °‘ W
§‘ Magistrate Judge.
H Il
E QE S. The case hasbeen referred to Magistrate Judge Donna F. Martinez for a settlement conference.
gs ‘ ‘? rf-;}
y
I. it tz ¤¤ i—-` 2 2;;;
{H ¤‘¤¤:¤:n:r ·—··- -~=» · I
·v·| ,2 ‘¤¤'!!:¤1m ___ i ·· ·;
ii 2 .t..g,, ?*i'1?‘?q;
D. 5.; q g S Ii @3 if.?
E4 § - ....> n

5 .. tg
*” 5 5
E i- a Ti
I
I5 "S I2! E
___ _' J'- _ I Ll,< __ _u ;'i n N gi-/T;g if JE; I:) r;-Le; in -*-2-; *7*;;*1;;;* T- mg: Tirrrré;-i!&i M Mr
1y lv if I _i .;___ - _i _— ip- fi nl 22*);; ):- JL; I;. if *-*3;*; -__;; rr JL-I f--fl?-;;fL lni Au-