Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

Case 3:03-cv—0061f1;RNC Document 37 Filed 08/1_1_/2004 Page 1 of 1 I
. I O tl; to l
!2rI:III iillli —l¤ gi, H, O,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT A fgitjil gi- T
DISTRICT oI= CONNECTICUT " “ ‘‘*1 · 4 —T»‘ y l
®
\> PHILIP wl. ANDREWS ; CIVIL ACTION l
Plaintiff ; No. S;0scvs11 (enc) i
i V- 5.-}* 5*% E l
I
. if M gjrgefendant : AUGUST 5, 2004 l
MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIIIIIE
- her_u.nd·ersigned, on behalf of the defendant, Reginald Allen, respectfully requests
" an enlargement of time of sixty (60) days from August 4, 2004 to and including October 3,
' __ 2004 in which to respond and/or object to the plaintiffs first set of interrogatories and- - y
g Requests for Production.
Q On July 8, 2004, defendant’s counsel received a voluminous packet from the pro se
Q plaintiff, Philip IVI. Andrews. This packet appeared to be responsive to defendant’s I
i pending Request for Production served on the plaintiff on December 8, 2003. On A
Q3 August 4, 2004, counsel for the undersigned was reviewing the packet of materials when it
E was found to contain multiple motions and what appeared to be interrogatories and \
Q Requests for Production from the plaintiffs These interrogatories and Requests for _
X Production were contained within transcripts, medical records and other miscellaneous A
xi documents. Thedocument entitled "PIaitniff’s interrogatories and Requests for Production"
E was dated June 10, 2004 and contained no certification page as to the date of service on
Onc Goodwin Square Phone (860) 522-6I03
;;i.¢::;v2:·.zz2t, ifiitipiii
=—— =-—»-i· T ·‘r* ..,,.... ,..Qj§..`j " " " ‘* T ‘ ·T· "=·~=
. - ~. =- 7;-L-.—._ ,>;____;__é;T_,§_'_eL_:H:q_§§§_§5;$>Bw:}5E»Pv1asI.1:,-*;;; T" ' T T - - V — - - » -.-. er;. :—,·;