Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

` ‘'_` L." ` ` Case 3:03-cv-005966lgA Document 78 Filed O2/25/ 004 Pag€`ILcILI4] {I/LQ,
D I
I IM V-I If=Z?2 I
I I ,.. .. _.. . I
UNITED STATES DISTRICT CdUR_ __ ,` I
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICLIT I - I
TOM JAMES COMPANY, ; CIVIL · TION NO. I .
I s0s| cv osss (JBA) ICA/IC,
_ Plaintiff, : I I
V» 2 I I
TRACE APPAREL Ltc and S (
J. TRACY GREEN, : Q I I
0 - , I
.5 Defendants. : FEEIRU RY 23, 2004 I
5 I I '
, MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME O ·• NSENT
I
Pursuant to Rule 7(b) of the Local Civil Rules of the} Un I ed States District Court I
for the District of Connecticut, the plaintiff, Tom James CoInp ny ("Tom James"), I
{Tia hereby moves this Court for an extension of time often (1lI)) d ys in which to file an
0 I
P opposition to the defendants, Trace Apparel and J. Tracy I3re n’s ("Defendants"), I
S I
_§ Motion to Compel, dated February 2, 2004 ("Motion"), up tp a d including March 4, I
,.0 2004. I
O I I
___>;“__ As good cause for the requested extension of time,ITo I James submits that, I
< W E I
lp despite its diligence in preparing an opposition to DefendaInts’ Motion, the additional
Q} time isgzrxfecessary to respond fully and adequately to the isIsuei set forth therein. Tom
E J£$esCijiee€I§_,the additional time requested in order to properl evaluate and analyze its .
I KD LM In _ I I
; pctsltion regarding the Motion. I I »
5* Tljgis isffém James’ first motion for extension of time re ardlng this matter. I
O L-··-· I I
*5 Counsel for Defendants has consented to the requested eI A I
O“° G°°"W‘“ Squaw HALLORAN _ Pl10nc(S(¤0)522—6l03 I
225 As lum Struct · hx I _ - ‘
l{31`tfUI§;i,CI· 00102 ‘ & SAGE l.,I.,l’ IuII§~Ir?2;1I{i1g006 I