Free Reply to Response to Motion - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

Case 3:03-cv-00583-JCH Qqcument 84 A Filed O3/14[ZOQ5 _,_Page 1 0f§ {
U¥0\ \ °€W %Tr\\iF> D\%\il`m\ Cum K
, A bx—é4xm’x Cmxeamsex
ii F E g q
w -»·-—·~‘ _- Q
QE, QOO5
* H
§ E Q¤4\u>gA . Z2? we ( ‘ ‘ W um
H k;\;mm¤X>_w+~\ gp \l&;?;>p;;e_‘X M
i H mz Q kLme©a ;>>.J;;m&
, Ei · ~~ » ,
Qmemg, ` Qm--we Q Kcrsa S\ewL&_>\>j;&>l
] g§g\HM,&\-MSK; {Mm gomwdx QL¤J\$»~D cgmikuil M hwxgwa. e ¤
X \}. UELQAQX, Q H $(l‘i84x*,%
, he apgqe —·O E ~ = u ‘ ee M {LB I
X §\c_X` (&JL;¤<;D.»*\M\$ (§,@D\§\' CBUQJ ukii V‘—°>‘$>fQ»..
mmxigkmj §;M&W.M\ (Lg/\\ Ywhkek Q,&Lm§Q» QQ 3
Xmxg . gg QS Uysc. % New CM \ m%E% my
\»Qem&u M M www OQ Kywkm Ou Kean me
Q¤>»>uQ:\>\¤z,¤ce ©C - i>+¤x\x¤e» MS ¤,>;\»`>Q es¤.$ ,
gl an Rm Qseq RL Q.\m`»jQ OQ Uwug %\e»g}m$
Q@\~>(>?»C§*G‘R }\<5 g>¥\$~1eQ,$\' O ~l
Q} \\»-$¤\\ OSQL cn? cglbscxmxiopkx "Q0we@.~¥ih \ v
\>v»¤5¤$.~Lc;e Q\Am¥\&‘{ QM-$g &e¤;\»\ ¤.>x§\
Q \ 0{ 5 {
e*?= e
—eee eee;-e

Case 3:O3-cv-OO583-JCH- Document 84 Filed O3/14/2005 Page20f3
4 ._ x{\>¤L»iV¤\ie .®{ \)`Us—.5H M Q\,»\,,_,\\.{Y gwuacvqg
,\ e.. me he me ¤_>¤»e¤>.·L.—` .
Ql—e>~‘$€e ie wwuwiy-L] AN ;_Mw&»¥< Jc>\R.,... Vrwmw- ; R
wig »\/Le lP V ~».» ·I—J—·<~G.» _S¢.JJ"‘>;· _ I
Lew. Q\~\N~>jQ` O( VCLUUQ _$>L<»¤»>\J~ I¤.<2. m\]<1~¤¤;}· H,¤jAw(
Irlwx. \—¤;`/»¤cg,&l¤j¤·¤>·¤--5, Axel lac Las; $%wx~yw\e
mw [OMQK pb»x»€L»»> Let [/w~{»».Les; , W
*§?§>_~»Qs, \}. £e¤z» ; KQ B XTQQ Mill,
pm»$Q Y\9:}¤`$f.>}—>$Q,.% Qlwwje CA Uw0——Q.
Fw-Q \\.Q,L<>_b\»’~»>"k
lfgqx ()\~.,-»L.e(·»¤e\5 pmea. ACw»> LU—»{“F 2¤¤i¤AeJL¤eE ;
QLQJ ~· $QF___j9 i}-·i.‘;.OO N
me @-1.
new z ew gl wh, 5
GULLCMQ (Qi Of¤©E? ©
f
2 6% 5

Case 3:03-cv-00583-JC· 4/2005 Pagei·30f3 4
5;; ML ki A QM ¤* “;Q WMS `”°j “
MXOMQT OM 0 QQ)
Oy Qqgcb A
MLM} $ wmLA\,
mw 5 *¢->-—-1 SV W
LX OC¤l<>?>
‘% & m~&~—¤
U w ¤*`< ‘*‘iOO
4
1i
w |q
h M
»
ai [
B c>{ E