Case 3:03-cv-00574-CFD
Document 24
Filed 02/01/2005
Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
JAMES STERBINSKY v. JOHN ARMSTRONG PRISONER Case No. 3:03CV574(CFD) (WIG)
ORDER The petitioner has informed the court that he has been discharged from his Connecticut prison sentence and now resides in Pennsylvania. The Department of Correction has verified that
the petitioner has no additional term of parole or probation to serve in connection with his sentence. Rule 83.1(c) of the Local
Civil Rules of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut, requires a pro se party to provide the Court with a written notice indicating an address within Connecticut where he can be served with motions, pleadings and other court documents filed in the case. The petitioner has not provided the
court with a Connecticut address where he may be served with documents filed and rulings issued in this case. In addition, the relief sought in the petition for writ of habeas corpus appears to be moot in view of the petitioner's discharge from his sentence. The court directs the petitioner to
show cause why the petition for writ of habeas corpus should not
Case 3:03-cv-00574-CFD
Document 24
Filed 02/01/2005
Page 2 of 2
be dismissed as moot.
The petitioner shall file his response to
this order, including an address in Connecticut where he may be served with documents and rulings filed in this case, on or before March 1, 2005. SO ORDERED this 1st day of February, 2005, at Bridgeport, Connecticut. /s/ William I. Garfinkel WILLIAM I. GARFINKEL UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
2