Free Order on Motion to Continue - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 50.5 kB
Pages: 1
Date: April 23, 2004
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 364 Words, 2,307 Characters
Page Size: 612.72 x 1008 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/22677/33.pdf

Download Order on Motion to Continue - District Court of Connecticut ( 50.5 kB)


Preview Order on Motion to Continue - District Court of Connecticut
,________nR_m_ -_._..._.....-_. ....~..—.—.....,
Case 3:03-cv-00560-AWT Document 33 Filed O4/23/2004 Page 1 of 1
ui _ . V. R _-i . `
a 1
l
M 1
o
E
O {V-"· ...____\
3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ` “ 1.. a·‘-
rg DISTRICT OFF CONNECTICU'I},_.
· I--V1 ¤'..h,r`5 I it J rr-- ,.
s ` . j “ is is
CRYSTAL RESTORATION SERVICES, INC. : 1-QI Q `{ pr -4 - {
. . . :;'*¤··· ,-?.··· '
Z . ‘ * · r.‘. .1 LJ __
mj Plaintiff] : CIVIL NO. 3:03CV0560 (AWT% 1
0 I
P") ~`.- I
.. v. : -·
0* . 1
iii CRYSTAL RESTORATION ENTERPRISES, INC. : 1
§ Defend.ant. : April 16, 2004 1
N · 1
a 1
‘ I
E Q, DEFENDANT’S MOTION ON CONSENT ?
B 3 TO CONTINUE EVIDENTIARY HEARING
U <\l
O "·~.
O S The defendant Crystal Restoration Enterprises, Inc. ("CREI"), with the consent of the 1
j_i "··~. 1
wi I
E plaintiff] hereby moves for an order continuing; the evidentiary hearing presently scheduled for 1
r··—|
:1
E E April 26, 2004 until a date in September 2004 convenient to the Court’s schedule. In support of I
U N
es
Q 3 this motion, CREI represents as follows:
in
pj -I-J
$ Q The parties are continuing to assess whether there is a basis for settlement of this
Q I Q. -
E Qniatter,4. °
fi ‘" I 1
E M Counsel for the parties have agreed to conduct limited discovery in advance of any
M . A I J *` -
L; _ "`heari_iig that may need to be held on the plaintiff` s request for a preliminary injunction. The
11 gig
`.>·• · vii.; _ ,
Q 1 Q parties hope that the completion of that discovery may assist them'in resolving this matter.
-r~1 {D
,|_] »
_§ D 3. Counsel for the parties believe that this additional period, combined with the
4-1 C.
ifs I`; gl completion ofthe contemplated discovery, will allow them to determine whether a settlement is 1
.¤ ~ o
E 3 ·§ possible, or whether it will be necessary for them to ask the Court to conduct a hearing on the
E E plaintiff' s request for a preliminary injunction.
z ` gi
§ •—|
cn nr: _
a=-a -- - -;:-4:
Ti T. Q ; C _ VIII
4- { -4- 4- ..-- 4`T-ELI QQ; T IITQT QQ? I;i‘ii}if`_iIi°T{mM‘%;m%`1i‘08IG;
.... .. ... . AA.-