Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

l {
i rf Case 3 O3-cv-00556-PCD Document 18 Filed 12/00/2003 Page 1 of 1*31.
l r · O O
U UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
I DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT rj 5 E gy
i 5. I 6... .... .,.
I ' lg —·—·———-— lla: l li itil ‘U“~‘
I E THOMAS K. VERDOCK, : 'e ' J
¤· : ELS Z}l5`!*2ir_‘l"C0'}5€?I
I éggsi Plain iff, ; mir; l-my; r;r1·+i:+_ ,
I , Q ; Ne. 3:03CV0556 (PCD) /Z/VPL,
( mid v. :
§°" l = Q
l ygmi EMSAR, IN Z., : November 26, 2003
· lv % = i
i é §•$ Defen lant. :
. Q`
r M S
l l
MOTION TO EXTEND SCHEDULING DEADLINES l
rg Pursuant t0 Rule 7(b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure, the Defendant
wg _
Q? Emsar, Inc. respectfully requests that the scheduling deadlines incorporated in the parties' Rule
? qa 26(fj report b: extended to provide that discovery shall be completed by February 27, 2004,
Q dispositive m tions shall be tiled by March 28, 2004, and if no dispositive motions are tiled, the
case shall be ready for trial by April 15, 2004. In support of this motion, the Defendant
. l
`§ QQ represents: l
I ` l
1. The undersigned this day attempted to reach Plaintiff s counsel, Andrew I
G S V
E‘ _ Houlding. I w is unable to reach him, and was thus unable to determine whether he consents or I
\ ,'_ objects to this notion. I
·r \
2, The parties each previously requested one extension of time to respond to
’ l
‘w`% §¤ the opposing p 1rty's interrogatories and requests for production.
. A _? .
% § r $$*3 3; The current schedule provides that discovery shall be completed by
ce _ gr: eg
W { No§g§1bep§8,.`2'003, dispositive motions shall be tiled by January I5, 2004, and if no dispositive
§ mqltlilrins case is to be ready for trial by January 30, 2004.
s..,.,,_ CJ? JI] `
( ;;JZ
{ __._4 i xr-:
I
l
l
1