Free Amended Document - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 73.5 kB
Pages: 4
Date: January 19, 2005
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 690 Words, 3,735 Characters
Page Size: 612.72 x 1008 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/22573/62.pdf

Download Amended Document - District Court of Connecticut ( 73.5 kB)


Preview Amended Document - District Court of Connecticut
—·•—-•-·~v~·—
I I I
Case 3:03-cv-00456@5lK Document 62 Filed 01/14/2005 Page 1 of 4
.. , I I)
I gr I
S EN {T S .
I Ls1..1¤ I
{ I
I Z .
IIII5 J/IN III I;) I: .,.8 I
I"'· I
UNITED STATES DISTRICT ·:I IRIQI II I
DISTRICT OF CONNECTIQ III~I,f;_I;,.*I.:·I`4I"£I;;}%;IIII- I
I Kerin Carmody _
I Plaintiff I
` )
VS ) IVI ACTION NO.
) O3CVOO456(MRK)
)
Koh1’s Department Stores, Inc. I
Defendant ) anuIry 12, 2005 I
DEFENDANTIS SUPPLEMENT TO JOINT RIAL MEMORANDUM
Appended hereto are defendant’s Propo ed Verdict Form, Voir
Dire questions and Jury Instructions in theIabove matter.
I
THE DEFENDANT _
I I
I M
B C
R P. IIET Y I
R IO I BE TSKY 1
10 Mai meet I
Suite -
East H&IEH,ICT 06512 I
{ (2O3)46I—8U80 I
Federal Barw ct 05313 I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I
I I
` I
I
I
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
{ I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I

Case 3:03-cv-OO456@I15{K Document 62 Filed O1/14(?0)O5 Page 2 of 4 1
n Y I"111 ~·~··‘
1
1 I
1
I I
CERTIFICATION 1 1
This is to certify that a copy of the for g0in@ was mailed US Main
this 12* day January, 2005 to: U 1
Richard H. Greene, Esq. 1
431 Howe Avenue 1 1
Shelton, CT 06615 I
1 _ . { N Iiiuln
.»:· P1 mms · _
l
I I
1 1
1 1 I
I
1 1
I 1 1
I
1
1 1 1
I I
5 1 1
1 1
1
1
1



. j ¤ I
Case 3:03-cv-OO45@\7bRK Document 62 Filed 01/1 @05 Page 3 of 4
,. · T E

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT or CONNECTI UT
Kerin Carmody { I
- Plaintiff
) ` {
vs . > IVIL`ACTION No.
> 0scv004ss(nRK;
>
Kohl’s Department Stores, Inc. ) y
Defendant ) anudry l2, 2005
1 1
pnoposmn vsnnrcw so ·, {
9(3)(B)' y
"We the jury unanimously find: i `
T. DEFENDANT'S LIABILITY y T
`
\
l. Do you find that the defendant KOHL'S DEPARTMENT STORES
was negligent in one or more of the ways alleged in the complaint?
Yrs no
2. If your answer to question l is “yes,” do you find that
such negligence was a proximate cause of the injuries claimed by the
plaintiff Kerin Carmody?
rss no y
.If you have found that the defendant +as not negligent or that
its negligence was not a proximate cause of the injuries claimed by
the plaintiff, you have completed your deliberations. Do not answer i
any of the other answers on this form. Go irectly to Page 2 and e
sign and date this form otherwise proceed t Section II.
Tr. compaaawxvs uscrxcsucz y
l. Do you find the conduct of the plaintiff was a
contributing cause of her injuries?
YES NO i
l
i
, ..,..... ...... —,% ,........ """""""""" ’ 7"" ' ''''
i
i
i i
i 1
2 l
§ i i
E \
¤ l
T
§ i
§ i

I I
Case 3:03-cv-OO45€T|VIRK Document 62 Filed O1/1@@)O5 Page40f4 I
~ ‘ I I
I I
I I
I
I I
_ I I
_2. What percentage of responsibilityIdo you attribute to the *
plaintiff? I
If you find that the percentage of re_pon ibility attributed
to the plaintiff is greater than 50%, you h`ve ompleted your '
deliberations. Do not answer any of the ot er questions on this I
form. Go directly to page 3 and sign and d`te bhis form. I
Otherwise, proceed to Section III. I
111. DAMAGES: I I
What amount of compensatory damages dn you award the plaintiff I
in past economic damages? I
I
———~»—~·»»~—-; I
What amount of damages do you award the plaintiff for past
non- economic or future non—economic (if applicable) damages to the
plaintiff?
[ I
I TOTAL
IReduction of award by percentage of nbgligence attributed to
the plaintiff
I a
- I
I TOTAL
AWARD
I hereby certify that this is the unahimous verdict of the
jury. I
I E
II Foreman Date I
I
I I I
(` I
3 ”
I
I I
I
i
g I
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I
2
§ I
I I
2
I I