Free Order - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

Case 3:03-cv—00454—RNC Document 33 Filed 11/12/2003 Page 1 of 2 1
. 1
1l{€‘@@\I@ DO RF l
BEE LAW i
58% irtéétiiivitiitr 14,,,, Ig 3 In rll ‘ll3 Hm?O‘iET§§‘;§.itEil2;G¥%'2HE-Iat 1
3 ii'.ii:§iAI§§E2Ei&I§.‘I;.§R:‘I — P
%‘é`P'5é%¤$i%ii»T'i~»sSLER¢ R.i·,i¥’iiiIi.iiiil—I..rl»- ....l?23i?r2.;i2:..., I
·§ WILLIAM I‘·C°I’~I“‘?·AN U <·, msn it.li;‘I‘ .2=.lt%%iE. www.hl~law.com
A oxvm s. MONASTERSKY ·° _ 1
Mica/mtr. Koss 1
J §i%‘;%}"Eii.i%Av?€E€”E tDW.i’§§'§'ii?.m 1
S PAUL ERlCKSON*" mm
5 DANIEL c. Dsmsxcu/~.Nr<> 1
· ·` us/I K. mus ~
4 xmxxxomx L. voccroo S 1
S BEATRICE S. JORDAN 4 <>A1.so .···.1;>MrrrEo in New YoKK 1
Q JAY T. DoNFRANCISCO °ALso Aomtrrnom FLORIDA 1
JOHN J. RADSHAW, IU AALSO Aomrrrreo rn ILLINOIS I
DEANN K. sswoun 1
ERIC D. som I
E$.'f,Ii2*fIt’2;.%i.iZi>N I
’ MAGDALENA P. PAKNELLP 1
§— 3 I November 6, 2003
fl. The Honorable Robert N. Chatigny
‘_C~ Q United States District Court Judge
·$\E United States District Court ,
450 Main Street I
Q Hartford, CT 06103
si _ *
· Q Re: The Carriers L.L.C. etal v. Town of Farmln ton etal
V, Docket Number: 3:03 CV 0454
\'!____" The Carriers, L.L.C. v. Town of Farmington, etal 1
_‘\ Docket Number: CV 02 05167918 g
D 1
Q § The Carriers, L.L.C. v. Town of Farmington, etal
Docket Number: CV 02 05186068
di; I
Dear Judge Chatigny:
I write today to inform you that the parties have reached a global resolution. As you may 1
recall, this case actually involves three lawsuits, two pending in the state court and the case
- § pending before you. Settlement conferences were held on Friday, October 31, 2003 and
Q k Monday, November 3, 2003 before the Honorable George Levine, presiding judge of the Tax ,
z and Administrative Appeals Court for the Judicial District of New Britain.
I;
3 Beiéausézfefjjhe multiplicity of parties, the three distinct actions, the number of releases, 1
thenecessity ofiéggrovai by the Town Council of Farmington, we ask that you take no actlon on ‘
g · anyifiendiitg motipirgs before you until the time that we may file a stipulation for dismissal in
inpliance~with{l§ed. R. Civ. P. 41. I believe that we will have all of the documents executed
P-. ;i'; 3. {Si-`?f£
g ,, ,. ;j..; gif}:
é` @4;,, 4
\ 1
'•·•·.
-
________________...2.l
i`iil I `l‘' 4 é? -iiiirii:-; 1;; -,,_ _, , , _ g y ,_ __ g
`i`iiiii "*P**>‘
?_1`.`·" Z, _ ‘·j;‘*{*jfT __T TQ, ‘- _' ggg ; P -g_y_‘ ··.·· Pr .· t q i .· ··:P ~ -»- A -— -- l
f 1; _;__ i _ i 7 _ 7 _ K _ 7 _ 7 _ rr-;W_;;-Q

Case 3:03-cv—00454—RNC Document 33 Filed 11/12/2003 Page 2 of 2 I
HOWD & LUDORF l
Page 2 l
Letter to The Honorable Robert N. Chatigny
Re: The Carriers, L.L.C., etal v. Town of Farmington, etal
. . l
and exchanged prior to January 1, 2004. Accordrngly l ask that you allow us until January 15, l
2004 in which to file the stipulation for dismissal. l
Again, this resolution is global and completely disposes of all the lawsuits, state and l
federal. Your assistance in this matter would be greatly appreciated.
Do not hesitate to contact me with additional questions or concerns.
I certify that this correspondence was sent to all counsel of record in the case pending
before you and the state court actions on this day.
V t you l
" [
John J. Radshaw, ll
JJR/egm l
cc: Robert A. Ziegler, Esquire
Joseph L. Hammer, Esquire
Kari L. Olson, Esquire
Todd W. Whitford, Esquire
z
l
l
i
i
i
l
l
l