Free Motion Hearing - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

`
I I Case 3:03-cv-00444-AWT Document 47 Filed Page 1 ont: umm 10. mz)
I DEPUTY CLERK Q ,g Magi
I TOTAL TIME: _I__ hours L minutes . `é""—`“
I DATE 219 STARTTIME ENDTIME [2'jgpm.
I LUNCH RECESS FROM TO
RECESS FROM TO (rf more than U2 hour)
I lZD5éfm9um': crv11,No. j’,g3QIgf{f[f [HMT] .
I VS. g IQQE ATTACHED CALENDAR FOR COUNSEL
11 md Iéizgggnég £,¢.dL, §
I <¤h•=¤k me wx)
(mhrgh) Motion Hearing D (confmhrg.) Confirmation Hearing D (showhrg.) Show Cause Hearing
(coutmphrg.) Contempt Hearing D (evidhrg.) Evidentiary Hearing E (jgmdbexam.) Judgment Debtor Exam _
I (pchrg.) Probable Cause Hearing E (fairhrg.) Fairness Hearing III tstlmthrg.) Settlement Hearing
I (mischrg.) Miscellaneous Hearing '
I I
I Morrow
DOCUMENT N0. 2
I ..... {B3 Motion ’ K D granted Q denied Egdvisement
I ..... @35 Motion · Q granted E] denied Qgvisement
..... L_ Motion D granted I] denied E advisement
III ..... {__ Motion I] granted E denied E advisement
..... L_ Motion D granted B denied I;] advisement I
..... L_ Motion III granted III denied. E advisement I
..... 5; Motion El granted D denied I;] advisement
I;] ..... Oral Motion granted III denied D advisement I
E ..... Oral Motion ` . E granted D denied Q advisement
..... Oral Motion III granted EI denied III advisement
..... Oral Motion III granted III denied I] advisement I
......... III Brief(s) due Proposed Findings due __________ Response due I
|]—[l— I
...... . . . tiled doclceted I
......... III mea I;] decreed
......... ` I] filed _ EI docketed
......... El ma: I] uuekeeu - I
......... · E filed D docketed =
......... E tiled EI docketed
......... El med El secreted
......... - l III tiled I] docketed I
_________ E filed B dggkgtgd
......... Dried Elmer
____,,,,, Hearing continued until g at ________________

-

i Q Case 3:03-cv-00444-AWT Document 47 Filed 02/O4/2004 Page2of3
1
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
W DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT _
? Amended \
Miscellaneous Calendar {
I Honorable Donna F. Martinez, U. S. Magistrate Judge
1 450 Main Street
l Hartford · i
E East Courtroom `
i February 4, 2004 1
l 11:30 a.m. W
The motion(s) listed below will be heard at oral argument. The ¥
scheduling of a motion for oral argument does not relieve the
opposing party of its obligation to file responsive papers. If no 3
response has been filed 21 days after the filing of the motion,
the motion may be granted and oral argument cancelled. See D. \
Conn., L. Civ. R. 9. 5
CASE NO. 3:03CV444 (ANT) Rosemount v. Weed Instrument, et al. i
Oral Argument on Defendant's Motion for Protective Order
(doc.#33) & (doc.#39). \
COUNSEL OF RECORD: Q
Matthew J. Becker Day, Berry & Howard 1
Cityplace
Hartford, CT 06103-3499
860—275—0100
[email protected]
Lynn A. Kappelman Seyfarth Shaw - MA E
World Trade Center East
Two Seaport Lane
` Suite 300
Boston, MA 02210-2028
617-946-4800
617—946—480l (fax}
[email protected]
James Mahanna 0/// Day. BGIIY & Howard
Cityplace I
185 Asylum Street E
Hartford, CT 06103-3449 j
860-275-00354
` 860-275-0343 (fax) Y
[email protected]
1

j ' R * Case 3:03-cv-00444-AWT Document 47 Filed 02/O4/2004 Page 3 of 3
l I
` Daniel W. McDonald L", Merchant & Gould E
C 3200 IDS Center i
i 80 South 8th St.
p Suite 3200 l
; Minneapolis, MN 55402 2
Q 612—322—6300
6 [email protected]
} Jonathan M. Plissner Epstein, Becker & Green, P.C.
Q One Landmark Square
\ Ste. 1800 `
_ stamford, CT 06901-2165
203—348—3737
i David S. Poppick ¤" Epstein, Becker & Green, P.C. \
I One Landmark Square, Ste 1800
stamferd, CT 06901-2165
203-348-3737
203-324-9291 (fax)
[email protected] :
William D. Schultz Merchant & Gould \
3200 IDS Center
80 South 8th St.
Suite 3200
Minneapolis, MN 55402 ¤
612-332-5300
, wschultz@merchant—gould.com
R0l,£,,g wnfe. 1/
BY ORDER OF THE COURT
KEVIN F. ROWE, cLERK
I