Free Motion for Protective Order - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

A rrvr »—W----——--—-———-———· .;...-.J..-....».»......l....... -..ll.. ` ....__....._--
= l
_ 2 · Case 3:03-cv-00444-AWT Document 33-3 Filed 1 /15/2003 P e 1 of 2 `
ir
l I
M} if *5 e 2: 5.8,.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COU T ii")}_§J,{E’ i ii/CT CUUR-T-J-—·
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT Q i` R FORD_ QTL if
ROSEMOUNT AEROSPACE INC., :
Plaintiff, : Civil Action o. 3(D3CiV0444
A vs. : E
3 l
WEED INSTRUMENT COMPANY, INC., : Q
and HARCO LABORATORIES, INC., :
= l
Defendants. : DECEMBER 12, 2003l
DECLARATION IN SUPPORT O
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR A PROTE I T VE O ER
DAVID S. POPPICK, ESQ., pursuant to 28 U.S.C., § 1746 declares:
l. I am a member of the Bar of this Court and a mem er of Epstein Becker & Green,
P.C., attorneys for Defendant Harco Laboratories, Inc. ("Harco"). I submit this eclaration in
support of Harco’s Motion for a Protective Order, pursuant to Fe eral Ruies of Ci il Procedure
26(b) and 26(c), and this COl.1l'iL,S Local Rule 37(a)(2). {
2. I certify that I have conferred with opposing couns I, Williaim D. Sc ultz, Esq. of
Merchant & Gould, P.C., attorneys for Plaintiff, Rosemount erospace, Inc., egarding the i
i a
subject of the accompanying Motion for Protective Order in a g od faithleffort to eliminate or I
l
ST:27345vl I
‘= ..... “;i"]--. .--. .22-we-I -2 iili "TT··r·*""··*·r*····` - . .

¤ I | ( l 1
‘ ` l Case 3:03-cv-00444-AWT Document 33-3 Filed 1 /15/2003 P e 2 of 2
H
reduce the area of controversy and arrive at a mutually satisfact iy resohiition. T ose attempts
have failed, and we have been unable to reach any agreement. _
3. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoin; is true and corre t.
Dated: December 12,2003 ;
1
EPSTEIN BECKE ·· & GREEN, 1>. .
‘ J F !//Q.
David S. Poppick, Es . (# · 2 2)
Attorneys for Defehd nt g
HARCO LABORAT·• MES, C.
One Landmark Squar , 18th Fl oor
Stamford, CT 06901 .
(203) 348-3737 E
ST:2'/345vl 2 = I
**"-‘-“‘“"""""""""""‘ "" I- | —_--1--____—_-j_-