Free Order on Motion for Protective Order - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 37.2 kB
Pages: 2
Date: April 1, 2004
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 328 Words, 2,068 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/22560/33.pdf

Download Order on Motion for Protective Order - District Court of Connecticut ( 37.2 kB)


Preview Order on Motion for Protective Order - District Court of Connecticut
Case 3:03-cv-00443-MRK

Document 33

Filed 04/01/2004

Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

LORRAINE M. CAISSE, Plaintiff, v. DAY KIMBALL HOSPITAL, Defendant.

: : : : : : : : :

CIVIL NO. 3:03cv443 (MRK)

ENDORSEMENT ORDER [DOC. #25]

The Motion for a Stipulated Protective Order [doc. #25] is GRANTED in part with respect to all documents designated as "CONFIDENTIAL." Nevertheless, if either party wants to designate anything filed with the Court as confidential and place it under seal, that party will have to make a separate motion, specifying precisely what is to be kept under seal and demonstrating good cause as to why the Court should depart from the strong presumption against sealing any court records to public inspection. See Nixon v. Warner Comm., Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 579-99 (1978); Video Software Dealers Assoc. v. Orion Pictures, Corp. (In re Orion Pictures Corp.), 21 F.3d 24, 26 (2d Cir. 1994). In limited circumstances and upon a showing of compelling circumstances, this Court may order certain records to be sealed. However, "[i]n most cases, a judge must carefully and skeptically review sealing requests to insure that there really is an extraordinary circumstance or compelling need." Id. at 27 (citation omitted). Moreover, ordinarily, a court must make that determination on the basis of a careful document-by-document review. A blanket sealing order such as that requested in Paragraph 6(a) would rarely, if ever, be appropriate. Until either party demonstrates the existence of an extraordinary circumstance or compelling need to seal from public view any specific document

Case 3:03-cv-00443-MRK

Document 33

Filed 04/01/2004

Page 2 of 2

filed in this case, this Court will not depart from its governing presumption of open access. The Clerk is directed to docket the Stipulated Protective Order attached as Exhibit A to the Motion for A Stipulated Protective Order [doc. #25].

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/

Mark R. Kravitz United States District Judge

Dated at New Haven, Connecticut: April 1, 2004.

2