Free Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

Case 3:03-cv-00420-MRK

Document 28

Filed 01/26/2004

Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT SUSAN BROWN VS. REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT 13 WILLIAM D. BRECK, SUSAN L. VICCARO, and ANN RICHARDSON : : : : : : : :

NO. 3:03CV00420 (MRK)

JANUARY 24, 2004

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

The plaintiff respectfully moves that she be granted a two-week extension of time, until February 19, 2004, within which to respond to the defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. In support of this motion, she represents as follows: 1. Her response presently is due on February 5, 2004. 2. No prior motions for extension of time for this purpose have been made. 3. Defense counsel is unavailable to advise his position on this motion. 4. The undersigned will be out of the country from this evening until February 2, 2004, has several other pending motions to which responsive briefs must be written, and cannot properly respond to the instant motion within the time currently provided.

Case 3:03-cv-00420-MRK

Document 28

Filed 01/26/2004

Page 2 of 2

THE PLAINTIFF

BY___________________________ JOHN R. WILLIAMS (ct00215) Williams and Pattis, LLC 51 Elm Street, Suite 409 New Haven, CT 06510 (203) 562-9931 Fax: (203) 776-9494 E-Mail: [email protected] Attorney for Plaintiff

CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE A copy hereof was mailed, on the above date, via first-class mail, postage prepaid, to Mark J. Sommaruga, Esq., Sullivan, Schoen, Campane & Connon, LLC, 646 Prospect Avenue, Hartford, CT 06105.

_________________________ JOHN R. WILLIAMS

2