Free Answer to Complaint - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 96.9 kB
Pages: 28
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 5,534 Words, 35,630 Characters
Page Size: 611 x 791 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/22500/297.pdf

Download Answer to Complaint - District Court of Connecticut ( 96.9 kB)


Preview Answer to Complaint - District Court of Connecticut
Case 3:03-cv-00383-WIG

Document 297

Filed 01/30/2006

Page 1 of 28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT ______________________________ WASLEY PRODUCTS, INC., ET AL. : : Plaintiffs, : CASE NO. 3:03-cv-383(MRK) : V. : : BARRY LEONARD BULAKITES, : ET AL. : : Defendants. : JANUARY 30, 2006 ______________________________: ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES OF DEFENDANTS BARRY L. BULAKITES, JAMES A. WINSLOW AND JOSHUA ADAMS CORPORATION TO PLAINTIFFS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT Defendants Barry L. Bulakites, James A. Winslow and Joshua Adams Corporation (collectively the Bulakites Defendants ),

through undersigned counsel, hereby answer the Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint dated September 29, 2005 as follows: I. 1. 2. 3. JURISDICTION AND VENUE

Paragraph one is denied. Paragraph two is denied. Paragraph three is denied.

1
LYNCH, TRAUB, KEEFE AND ERRANTE, P. C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 52 TRUMBULL STREET P.O. BOX 1612 NEW HAVEN, CONNECTICUT 06506-1612 TELEPHONE (203) 787-0275 FACSIMILE (203) 782-0278
W:\11000-11999\11437 B. BULAKITES\013 COMMERCIAL LITIGATION - SJE\PLEADINGS\2005\ANSWER & AFF DEFENSES TO SECOND AMD COMPLAINT DATED 9-29-05.DOC

Case 3:03-cv-00383-WIG

Document 297

Filed 01/30/2006

Page 2 of 28

II. 4.

PARTIES

As to paragraph four, the Bulakites Defendants have

insufficient knowledge upon which to form an opinion or belief and, therefore, leave the plaintiffs to their proof. 5. As to paragraph five, the Bulakites Defendants have

insufficient knowledge upon which to form an opinion or belief and, therefore, leave the plaintiffs to their proof. 6. As to paragraph six, the Bulakites Defendants have

insufficient knowledge upon which to form an opinion or belief and, therefore, leave the plaintiffs to their proof. 7. As to paragraph seven, the Bulakites Defendants have

insufficient knowledge upon which to form an opinion or belief and, therefore, leave the plaintiffs to their proof. 8. As to paragraph eight, the Bulakites Defendants have

insufficient knowledge upon which to form an opinion or belief and, therefore, leave the plaintiffs to their proof. 9. The Bulakites Defendants admit that portion of

paragraph six which states that Barry Bulakites is an individual

2
LYNCH, TRAUB, KEEFE AND ERRANTE, P. C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 52 TRUMBULL STREET P.O. BOX 1612 NEW HAVEN, CONNECTICUT 06506-1612 TELEPHONE (203) 787-0275 FACSIMILE (203) 782-0278
W:\11000-11999\11437 B. BULAKITES\013 COMMERCIAL LITIGATION - SJE\PLEADINGS\2005\ANSWER & AFF DEFENSES TO SECOND AMD COMPLAINT DATED 9-29-05.DOC

Case 3:03-cv-00383-WIG

Document 297

Filed 01/30/2006

Page 3 of 28

residing in Colorado.

The rest and remaining portions of

paragraph six are denied. 10. The Bulakites Defendants admit that portion of

paragraph seven which states that James Winslow is an individual residing in Westbrook, Connecticut. The rest and remaining

portions of paragraph seven are denied. 11. 12. Paragraph eleven is denied. As to paragraph twelve, the Bulakites Defendants have

insufficient knowledge from which to form an opinion or belief and, therefore, leave the plaintiffs to their proof. 13. As to paragraph thirteen, the Bulakites Defendants

have insufficient knowledge from which to form an opinion or belief and, therefore, leave the plaintiffs to their proof. III. FACTS A. BACKGROUND 14. As to paragraph fourteen, the Bulakites Defendants

have insufficient knowledge from which to form an opinion or belief and, therefore, leave the plaintiffs to their proof.

3
LYNCH, TRAUB, KEEFE AND ERRANTE, P. C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 52 TRUMBULL STREET P.O. BOX 1612 NEW HAVEN, CONNECTICUT 06506-1612 TELEPHONE (203) 787-0275 FACSIMILE (203) 782-0278
W:\11000-11999\11437 B. BULAKITES\013 COMMERCIAL LITIGATION - SJE\PLEADINGS\2005\ANSWER & AFF DEFENSES TO SECOND AMD COMPLAINT DATED 9-29-05.DOC

Case 3:03-cv-00383-WIG

Document 297

Filed 01/30/2006

Page 4 of 28

15.

As to paragraph fifteen, the Bulakites Defendants have

insufficient knowledge from which to form an opinion or belief and, therefore, leave the plaintiffs to their proof. 16. As to paragraph sixteen, the Bulakites Defendants have

insufficient knowledge from which to form an opinion or belief and, therefore, leave the plaintiffs to their proof. 17. As to paragraph seventeen, the Bulakites Defendants

have insufficient knowledge from which to form an opinion or belief and, therefore, leave the plaintiffs to their proof. 18. As to paragraph eighteen, the Bulakites Defendants

have insufficient knowledge from which to form an opinion or belief and, therefore, leave the plaintiffs to their proof. 19. As to paragraph nineteen, the Bulakites Defendants

have insufficient knowledge from which to form an opinion or belief and, therefore, leave the plaintiffs to their proof. Notwithstanding, should the letters referenced in paragraph sixteen exist, they speak for themselves. 20. As to paragraph twenty, the Bulakites Defendants have

insufficient knowledge from which to form an opinion or belief

4
LYNCH, TRAUB, KEEFE AND ERRANTE, P. C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 52 TRUMBULL STREET P.O. BOX 1612 NEW HAVEN, CONNECTICUT 06506-1612 TELEPHONE (203) 787-0275 FACSIMILE (203) 782-0278
W:\11000-11999\11437 B. BULAKITES\013 COMMERCIAL LITIGATION - SJE\PLEADINGS\2005\ANSWER & AFF DEFENSES TO SECOND AMD COMPLAINT DATED 9-29-05.DOC

Case 3:03-cv-00383-WIG

Document 297

Filed 01/30/2006

Page 5 of 28

and, therefore, leave the plaintiffs to their proof. Notwithstanding, should the letter referenced in paragraph twenty exist, it speaks for itself. 21. As to paragraph twenty-one, the Bulakites Defendants

have insufficient knowledge from which to form an opinion or belief and therefore, leave the plaintiffs to their proof. 22. As to paragraph twenty-two, the Bulakites Defendants

have insufficient knowledge from which to form an opinion or belief and therefore, leave the plaintiffs to their proof. 23. As to paragraph twenty-three, the Bulakites Defendants

have insufficient knowledge from which to form an opinion or belief and therefore, leave the plaintiffs to their proof. 24. As to paragraph twenty-four, the Bulakites Defendants

have insufficient knowledge from which to form an opinion or belief and therefore, leave the plaintiffs to their proof. 25. As to paragraph twenty-five, the Bulakites Defendants

have insufficient knowledge from which to form an opinion or belief and therefore, leave the plaintiffs to their proof.

5
LYNCH, TRAUB, KEEFE AND ERRANTE, P. C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 52 TRUMBULL STREET P.O. BOX 1612 NEW HAVEN, CONNECTICUT 06506-1612 TELEPHONE (203) 787-0275 FACSIMILE (203) 782-0278
W:\11000-11999\11437 B. BULAKITES\013 COMMERCIAL LITIGATION - SJE\PLEADINGS\2005\ANSWER & AFF DEFENSES TO SECOND AMD COMPLAINT DATED 9-29-05.DOC

Case 3:03-cv-00383-WIG

Document 297

Filed 01/30/2006

Page 6 of 28

26.

As to paragraph twenty-six, the Bulakites Defendants

have insufficient knowledge from which to form an opinion or belief and therefore, leave the plaintiffs to their proof. 27. As to paragraph twenty-seven, the Bulakites Defendants

have insufficient knowledge from which to form an opinion or belief and therefore, leave the plaintiffs to their proof. 28. As to paragraph twenty-eight, the Bulakites Defendants

have insufficient knowledge from which to form an opinion or belief and therefore, leave the plaintiffs to their proof. 29. As to paragraph twenty-nine, the Bulakites Defendants

have insufficient knowledge from which to form an opinion or belief and therefore, leave the plaintiffs to their proof. 30. As to paragraph thirty, the Bulakites Defendants have

insufficient knowledge from which to form an opinion or belief and therefore, leave the plaintiffs to their proof. 31. As to paragraph thirty-one, the Bulakites Defendants

have insufficient knowledge from which to form an opinion or belief and therefore, leave the plaintiffs to their proof. 32. Paragraph thirty-two is admitted.

6
LYNCH, TRAUB, KEEFE AND ERRANTE, P. C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 52 TRUMBULL STREET P.O. BOX 1612 NEW HAVEN, CONNECTICUT 06506-1612 TELEPHONE (203) 787-0275 FACSIMILE (203) 782-0278
W:\11000-11999\11437 B. BULAKITES\013 COMMERCIAL LITIGATION - SJE\PLEADINGS\2005\ANSWER & AFF DEFENSES TO SECOND AMD COMPLAINT DATED 9-29-05.DOC

Case 3:03-cv-00383-WIG

Document 297

Filed 01/30/2006

Page 7 of 28

33.

As to paragraph thirty-three, the Bulakites Defendants

have insufficient knowledge from which to form an opinion or belief and therefore, leave the plaintiffs to their proof. 34. As to paragraph thirty-four, the Bulakites Defendants

have insufficient knowledge from which to form an opinion or belief and therefore, leave the plaintiffs to their proof. 35. As to paragraph thirty-five, the Bulakites Defendants

have insufficient knowledge from which to form an opinion or belief and therefore, leave the plaintiffs to their proof. 36. As to paragraph thirty-six, the Bulakites Defendants

have insufficient knowledge from which to form an opinion or belief and therefore, leave the plaintiffs to their proof. 37. As to paragraph thirty-seven, the Bulakites Defendants

have insufficient knowledge from which to form an opinion or belief and therefore, leave the plaintiffs to their proof. 38. As to paragraph thirty-eight, the Bulakites Defendants

have insufficient knowledge from which to form an opinion or belief and therefore, leave the plaintiffs to their proof.

7
LYNCH, TRAUB, KEEFE AND ERRANTE, P. C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 52 TRUMBULL STREET P.O. BOX 1612 NEW HAVEN, CONNECTICUT 06506-1612 TELEPHONE (203) 787-0275 FACSIMILE (203) 782-0278
W:\11000-11999\11437 B. BULAKITES\013 COMMERCIAL LITIGATION - SJE\PLEADINGS\2005\ANSWER & AFF DEFENSES TO SECOND AMD COMPLAINT DATED 9-29-05.DOC

Case 3:03-cv-00383-WIG

Document 297

Filed 01/30/2006

Page 8 of 28

39.

As to paragraph thirty-nine, the Bulakites Defendants

have insufficient knowledge from which to form an opinion or belief and therefore, leave the plaintiffs to their proof. 40. 41. 42. Paragraph forty is admitted. Paragraph forty-one is admitted. As to paragraph forty-two, the Bulakites Defendants

have insufficient knowledge from which to form an opinion or belief and therefore, leave the plaintiffs to their proof. 43. As to paragraph forty-three, the Bulakites Defendants

have insufficient knowledge from which to form an opinion or belief and therefore, leave the plaintiffs to their proof. 44. As to paragraph forty-four, the Bulakites Defendants

have insufficient knowledge from which to form an opinion or belief and therefore, leave the plaintiffs to their proof. 45. As to paragraph forty-five, the Bulakites Defendants

have insufficient knowledge from which to form an opinion or belief and therefore, leave the plaintiffs to their proof.

8
LYNCH, TRAUB, KEEFE AND ERRANTE, P. C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 52 TRUMBULL STREET P.O. BOX 1612 NEW HAVEN, CONNECTICUT 06506-1612 TELEPHONE (203) 787-0275 FACSIMILE (203) 782-0278
W:\11000-11999\11437 B. BULAKITES\013 COMMERCIAL LITIGATION - SJE\PLEADINGS\2005\ANSWER & AFF DEFENSES TO SECOND AMD COMPLAINT DATED 9-29-05.DOC

Case 3:03-cv-00383-WIG

Document 297

Filed 01/30/2006

Page 9 of 28

46.

As to paragraph forty-six, the Bulakites Defendants

have insufficient knowledge from which to form an opinion or belief and therefore, leave the plaintiffs to their proof. 47. As to paragraph forty-seven, the Bulakites Defendants

have insufficient knowledge to form an opinion or belief and, therefore, leave the plaintiffs to their proof. 48. The Bulakites Defendants deny that portion of

paragraph forty-eight which states that their services were terminated due to problems with the service provided by JAC.

As to the rest and remaining portions of paragraph forty-eight, the Bulakites Defendants have insufficient knowledge from which to form an opinion or belief and therefore, leave the plaintiffs to their proof. B. Misconduct by the Defendants 49. As to paragraph forty-nine, the Bulakites Defendants

have insufficient knowledge from which to form an opinion or belief and therefore, leave the plaintiffs to their proof.

9
LYNCH, TRAUB, KEEFE AND ERRANTE, P. C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 52 TRUMBULL STREET P.O. BOX 1612 NEW HAVEN, CONNECTICUT 06506-1612 TELEPHONE (203) 787-0275 FACSIMILE (203) 782-0278
W:\11000-11999\11437 B. BULAKITES\013 COMMERCIAL LITIGATION - SJE\PLEADINGS\2005\ANSWER & AFF DEFENSES TO SECOND AMD COMPLAINT DATED 9-29-05.DOC

Case 3:03-cv-00383-WIG

Document 297

Filed 01/30/2006

Page 10 of 28

50.

As to paragraph fifty, the Bulakites Defendants have

insufficient knowledge from which to form an opinion or belief and therefore, leave the plaintiffs to their proof. 51. As to paragraph fifty-one, the Bulakites Defendants

have insufficient knowledge from which to form an opinion or belief and therefore, leave the plaintiffs to their proof. 52. that As to that portion of paragraph fifty-two which states

Based upon the research and investigation conducted by the

Companies, subsequent to the termination of the Bulakites, Winslow and JAC, the Bulakites Defendants have insufficient

knowledge upon which to form an opinion or belief and, therefore, leave the plaintiffs to their proof. The Bulakites

Defendants deny the rest and remaining portions of paragraph fifty-two. 53. The Bulakites Defendants deny that portion of

paragraph fifty-three that implies that they are responsible for the conversion of at least $768,000. As to the rest and

remaining portions of paragraph fifty-three, the Bulakites Defendants have insufficient knowledge from which to form an

10
LYNCH, TRAUB, KEEFE AND ERRANTE, P. C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 52 TRUMBULL STREET P.O. BOX 1612 NEW HAVEN, CONNECTICUT 06506-1612 TELEPHONE (203) 787-0275 FACSIMILE (203) 782-0278
W:\11000-11999\11437 B. BULAKITES\013 COMMERCIAL LITIGATION - SJE\PLEADINGS\2005\ANSWER & AFF DEFENSES TO SECOND AMD COMPLAINT DATED 9-29-05.DOC

Case 3:03-cv-00383-WIG

Document 297

Filed 01/30/2006

Page 11 of 28

opinion or belief and therefore, leave the plaintiffs to their proof. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF COUNT ONE WASLEY PRODUCTS ERISA CLAIM FOR BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY RE: THE PLANS (29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(2)) 54. The Bulakites Defendants incorporate their responses

to the allegations in paragraphs 1 through 53 above as if more fully set forth herein. 55. 56. Paragraph fifty-five is denied. As to paragraph fifty-six, the Bulakites Defendants

have insufficient knowledge from which to form an opinion or belief and therefore, leave the plaintiffs to their proof. 57. As to paragraph fifty-seven, the Bulakites Defendants

have insufficient knowledge from which to form an opinion or belief and therefore, leave the plaintiffs to their proof. 58. As to paragraph fifty-eight, the Bulakites Defendants

have insufficient knowledge from which to form an opinion or belief and therefore, leave the plaintiffs to their proof.

11
LYNCH, TRAUB, KEEFE AND ERRANTE, P. C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 52 TRUMBULL STREET P.O. BOX 1612 NEW HAVEN, CONNECTICUT 06506-1612 TELEPHONE (203) 787-0275 FACSIMILE (203) 782-0278
W:\11000-11999\11437 B. BULAKITES\013 COMMERCIAL LITIGATION - SJE\PLEADINGS\2005\ANSWER & AFF DEFENSES TO SECOND AMD COMPLAINT DATED 9-29-05.DOC

Case 3:03-cv-00383-WIG

Document 297

Filed 01/30/2006

Page 12 of 28

59.

The Bulakites Defendants deny that portion of

paragraph fifty-nine which states that the defendants were fiduciaries of the Plans. As to the rest and remaining

portions, the Bulakites Defendants have insufficient knowledge from which to form an opinion or belief and therefore, leave the plaintiffs to their proof. 60. The Bulakites Defendants deny that portion of

paragraph sixty which states that the defendants were fiduciaries of the Plans. As to the rest and remaining

portions, the Bulakites Defendants have insufficient knowledge from which to form an opinion or belief and therefore, leave the plaintiffs to their proof. 61. 62. Paragraph sixty-one is denied. Paragraph sixty-two is denied. COUNT TWO 54. The Bulakites Defendants incorporate by reference

their responses to the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 53 above as if more fully set forth herein. 55. Paragraph fifty-five is denied.

12
LYNCH, TRAUB, KEEFE AND ERRANTE, P. C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 52 TRUMBULL STREET P.O. BOX 1612 NEW HAVEN, CONNECTICUT 06506-1612 TELEPHONE (203) 787-0275 FACSIMILE (203) 782-0278
W:\11000-11999\11437 B. BULAKITES\013 COMMERCIAL LITIGATION - SJE\PLEADINGS\2005\ANSWER & AFF DEFENSES TO SECOND AMD COMPLAINT DATED 9-29-05.DOC

Case 3:03-cv-00383-WIG

Document 297

Filed 01/30/2006

Page 13 of 28

56.

As to paragraph fifty-six, the Bulakites Defendants

have insufficient knowledge from which to form an opinion or belief and therefore, leave the plaintiffs to their proof. 57. As to paragraph fifty-seven, the Bulakites Defendants

have insufficient knowledge from which to form an opinion or belief and therefore, leave the plaintiffs to their proof. 58. As to paragraph fifty-eight, the Bulakites Defendants

have insufficient knowledge from which to form an opinion or belief and therefore, leave the plaintiffs to their proof. 59. The Bulakites Defendants deny that portion of

paragraph fifty-nine which states that the defendants were fiduciaries of the Plans. As to the rest and remaining

portions, the Bulakites Defendants have insufficient knowledge from which to form an opinion or belief and therefore, leave the plaintiffs to their proof. 60. The Bulakites Defendants deny that portion of

paragraph sixty which states that the defendants were fiduciaries of the Plans. As to the rest and remaining

portions, the Bulakites Defendants have insufficient knowledge

13
LYNCH, TRAUB, KEEFE AND ERRANTE, P. C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 52 TRUMBULL STREET P.O. BOX 1612 NEW HAVEN, CONNECTICUT 06506-1612 TELEPHONE (203) 787-0275 FACSIMILE (203) 782-0278
W:\11000-11999\11437 B. BULAKITES\013 COMMERCIAL LITIGATION - SJE\PLEADINGS\2005\ANSWER & AFF DEFENSES TO SECOND AMD COMPLAINT DATED 9-29-05.DOC

Case 3:03-cv-00383-WIG

Document 297

Filed 01/30/2006

Page 14 of 28

from which to form an opinion or belief and therefore, leave the plaintiffs to their proof. 61. 62. Paragraph sixty-one is denied. Paragraph sixty-two is denied. COUNT THREE WASLEY PRODUCTS ERISA CLAIM FOR BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY RE: THE WASLEY 401(k) PLAN (29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(2)) 54. The Bulakites Defendants incorporate by reference

their responses to the allegations in paragraphs 1 through 53 above as if more fully set forth herein. 55. 56. Paragraph fifty-five is denied. As to paragraph fifty-six, the Bulakites Defendants

have insufficient knowledge from which to form an opinion or belief and therefore, leave the plaintiffs to their proof. 57. As to paragraph fifty-seven, the Bulakites Defendants

have insufficient knowledge from which to form an opinion or belief and therefore, leave the plaintiffs to their proof.

14
LYNCH, TRAUB, KEEFE AND ERRANTE, P. C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 52 TRUMBULL STREET P.O. BOX 1612 NEW HAVEN, CONNECTICUT 06506-1612 TELEPHONE (203) 787-0275 FACSIMILE (203) 782-0278
W:\11000-11999\11437 B. BULAKITES\013 COMMERCIAL LITIGATION - SJE\PLEADINGS\2005\ANSWER & AFF DEFENSES TO SECOND AMD COMPLAINT DATED 9-29-05.DOC

Case 3:03-cv-00383-WIG

Document 297

Filed 01/30/2006

Page 15 of 28

58.

As to paragraph fifty-eight, the Bulakites Defendants

have insufficient knowledge from which to form an opinion or belief and therefore, leave the plaintiffs to their proof. 59. The Bulakites Defendants deny that portion of

paragraph fifty-nine which states that the defendants were fiduciaries of the Wasley 401(k) Plan. As to the rest and

remaining portions, the Bulakites Defendants have insufficient knowledge from which to form an opinion or belief and therefore, leave the plaintiffs to their proof. 60. The Bulakites Defendants deny that portion of

paragraph sixty which states that the defendants were fiduciaries of the Wasley 401(k) Plan. As to the rest and

remaining portions, the Bulakites Defendants have insufficient knowledge from which to form an opinion or belief and therefore, leave the plaintiffs to their proof. 61. 62. Paragraph sixty-one is denied. Paragraph sixty-two is denied.

15
LYNCH, TRAUB, KEEFE AND ERRANTE, P. C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 52 TRUMBULL STREET P.O. BOX 1612 NEW HAVEN, CONNECTICUT 06506-1612 TELEPHONE (203) 787-0275 FACSIMILE (203) 782-0278
W:\11000-11999\11437 B. BULAKITES\013 COMMERCIAL LITIGATION - SJE\PLEADINGS\2005\ANSWER & AFF DEFENSES TO SECOND AMD COMPLAINT DATED 9-29-05.DOC

Case 3:03-cv-00383-WIG

Document 297

Filed 01/30/2006

Page 16 of 28

COUNT FOUR WASLEY PRODUCTS 1132(a)(3)) 54. ERISA CLAIM RE: WASLEY 401(k) PLAN (29 U.S.C. §

The Bulakites Defendants

incorporate by reference

their responses to the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 53 above as if more fully set forth herein. 55. 56. Paragraph fifty-five is denied. As to paragraph fifty-six, the Bulakites Defendants

have insufficient knowledge from which to form an opinion or belief and therefore, leave the plaintiffs to their proof. 57. As to paragraph fifty-seven, the Bulakites Defendants

have insufficient knowledge from which to form an opinion or belief and therefore, leave the plaintiffs to their proof. 58. As to paragraph fifty-eight, the Bulakites Defendants

have insufficient knowledge from which to form an opinion or belief and therefore, leave the plaintiffs to their proof. 59. The Bulakites Defendants deny that portion of

paragraph fifty-nine which states that the defendants were fiduciaries of the Wasley 401(k) Plan. As to the rest and

16
LYNCH, TRAUB, KEEFE AND ERRANTE, P. C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 52 TRUMBULL STREET P.O. BOX 1612 NEW HAVEN, CONNECTICUT 06506-1612 TELEPHONE (203) 787-0275 FACSIMILE (203) 782-0278
W:\11000-11999\11437 B. BULAKITES\013 COMMERCIAL LITIGATION - SJE\PLEADINGS\2005\ANSWER & AFF DEFENSES TO SECOND AMD COMPLAINT DATED 9-29-05.DOC

Case 3:03-cv-00383-WIG

Document 297

Filed 01/30/2006

Page 17 of 28

remaining portions, the Bulakites Defendants have insufficient knowledge from which to form an opinion or belief and therefore, leave the plaintiffs to their proof. 60. The Bulakites Defendants deny that portion of

paragraph sixty which states that the defendants were fiduciaries of the Wasley 401(k) Plan. As to the rest and

remaining portions, the Bulakites Defendants have insufficient knowledge from which to form an opinion or belief and therefore, leave the plaintiffs to their proof. 61. 62. Paragraph sixty-one is denied. Paragraph sixty-two is denied. COUNT FIVE PRECISION MOLDING S ERISA CLAIM FOR BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY RE: PRECISION MOLDING 401(k) (29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(2)) 54. The Bulakites Defendants incorporate their responses

to the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 53 above as if more fully set forth herein. 55. Paragraph fifty-five is denied.

17
LYNCH, TRAUB, KEEFE AND ERRANTE, P. C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 52 TRUMBULL STREET P.O. BOX 1612 NEW HAVEN, CONNECTICUT 06506-1612 TELEPHONE (203) 787-0275 FACSIMILE (203) 782-0278
W:\11000-11999\11437 B. BULAKITES\013 COMMERCIAL LITIGATION - SJE\PLEADINGS\2005\ANSWER & AFF DEFENSES TO SECOND AMD COMPLAINT DATED 9-29-05.DOC

Case 3:03-cv-00383-WIG

Document 297

Filed 01/30/2006

Page 18 of 28

56.

As to paragraph fifty-six, the Bulakites Defendants

have insufficient knowledge from which to form an opinion or belief and therefore, leave the plaintiffs to their proof. 57. As to paragraph fifty-seven, the Bulakites Defendants

have insufficient knowledge from which to form an opinion or belief and therefore, leave the plaintiffs to their proof. 58. As to paragraph fifty-eight, the Bulakites Defendants

have insufficient knowledge from which to form an opinion or belief and therefore, leave the plaintiffs to their proof. 59. The Bulakites Defendants deny that portion of

paragraph fifty-nine which states that the defendants were fiduciaries of the Precision Molding 401(k). As to the rest

and remaining portions, the Bulakites Defendants have insufficient knowledge from which to form an opinion or belief and therefore, leave the plaintiffs to their proof. 60. The Bulakites Defendants deny that portion of

paragraph sixty which states that the defendants were fiduciaries of the Precision Molding 401(k). As to the rest

and remaining portions, the Bulakites Defendants have

18
LYNCH, TRAUB, KEEFE AND ERRANTE, P. C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 52 TRUMBULL STREET P.O. BOX 1612 NEW HAVEN, CONNECTICUT 06506-1612 TELEPHONE (203) 787-0275 FACSIMILE (203) 782-0278
W:\11000-11999\11437 B. BULAKITES\013 COMMERCIAL LITIGATION - SJE\PLEADINGS\2005\ANSWER & AFF DEFENSES TO SECOND AMD COMPLAINT DATED 9-29-05.DOC

Case 3:03-cv-00383-WIG

Document 297

Filed 01/30/2006

Page 19 of 28

insufficient knowledge from which to form an opinion or belief and therefore, leave the plaintiffs to their proof. 61. 62. Paragraph sixty-one is denied. Paragraph sixty-two is denied. COUNT SIX PRECISION MOLDING S ERISA CLAIM RE: PRECISION MOLDING 401(k) (29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(3)) 54. The Bulakites Defendants incorporate by reference

their responses to the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 53 above as if more fully set forth herein. 55. Paragraph fifty-five is denied. 56. As to paragraph fifty-six, the Bulakites Defendants have insufficient knowledge from which to form an opinion or belief and therefore, leave the plaintiffs to their proof. 57. As to paragraph fifty-seven, the Bulakites Defendants have insufficient knowledge from which to form an opinion or belief and therefore, leave the plaintiffs to their proof.

19
LYNCH, TRAUB, KEEFE AND ERRANTE, P. C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 52 TRUMBULL STREET P.O. BOX 1612 NEW HAVEN, CONNECTICUT 06506-1612 TELEPHONE (203) 787-0275 FACSIMILE (203) 782-0278
W:\11000-11999\11437 B. BULAKITES\013 COMMERCIAL LITIGATION - SJE\PLEADINGS\2005\ANSWER & AFF DEFENSES TO SECOND AMD COMPLAINT DATED 9-29-05.DOC

Case 3:03-cv-00383-WIG

Document 297

Filed 01/30/2006

Page 20 of 28

58. As to paragraph fifty-eight, the Bulakites Defendants have insufficient knowledge from which to form an opinion or belief and therefore, leave the plaintiffs to their proof. 59. The Bulakites Defendants deny that portion of paragraph fifty-nine which states that the defendants were the Precision Molding 401(k). fiduciaries of

As to the rest and remaining

portions, the Bulakites Defendants have insufficient knowledge from which to form an opinion or belief and therefore, leave the plaintiffs to their proof. 60. The Bulakites Defendants deny that portion of paragraph sixty which states that the defendants were Precision Molding 401(k). fiduciaries of the

As to the rest and remaining

portions, the Bulakites Defendants have insufficient knowledge from which to form an opinion or belief and therefore, leave the plaintiffs to their proof. 61. Paragraph sixty-one is denied. 62. Paragraph sixty-two is denied.

20
LYNCH, TRAUB, KEEFE AND ERRANTE, P. C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 52 TRUMBULL STREET P.O. BOX 1612 NEW HAVEN, CONNECTICUT 06506-1612 TELEPHONE (203) 787-0275 FACSIMILE (203) 782-0278
W:\11000-11999\11437 B. BULAKITES\013 COMMERCIAL LITIGATION - SJE\PLEADINGS\2005\ANSWER & AFF DEFENSES TO SECOND AMD COMPLAINT DATED 9-29-05.DOC

Case 3:03-cv-00383-WIG

Document 297

Filed 01/30/2006

Page 21 of 28

COUNT SEVEN COMMON LAW BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY BY DEFENDANTS 54. The Bulakites Defendants incorporate by reference

their responses to the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 53 above as if more fully set forth herein. 55. 56. 57. Paragraph fifty-five is denied. Paragraph fifty-six is denied. Paragraph fifty-seven is denied. COUNT EIGHT PROFESSIONAL NEGLIGENCE/MALPRACTICE BY BULAKITES, WINSLOW, JAC, PROVIDENT MUTUAL AND LINCOLN 54. The Bulakites Defendants incorporate by reference

their responses to the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 53 above as if more fully set forth herein. 55. 56. Paragraph fifty-five is denied. Paragraph fifty-six is denied. COUNT NINE INTENTIONAL MISREPRESENTATION BY BULAKITES, WINSLOW, JAC AND PROVIDENT MUTUAL

21
LYNCH, TRAUB, KEEFE AND ERRANTE, P. C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 52 TRUMBULL STREET P.O. BOX 1612 NEW HAVEN, CONNECTICUT 06506-1612 TELEPHONE (203) 787-0275 FACSIMILE (203) 782-0278
W:\11000-11999\11437 B. BULAKITES\013 COMMERCIAL LITIGATION - SJE\PLEADINGS\2005\ANSWER & AFF DEFENSES TO SECOND AMD COMPLAINT DATED 9-29-05.DOC

Case 3:03-cv-00383-WIG

Document 297

Filed 01/30/2006

Page 22 of 28

54. The Bulakites Defendants

incorporate by reference

their responses to the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 53 above as if more fully set forth herein. 55. Paragraph fifty-five is denied. 56. 57. 58. 59. Paragraph fifty-six is denied. Paragraph fifty-seven is denied. Paragraph fifty-eight is denied. Paragraph fifty-nine is denied.

63. Paragraph sixty is denied. COUNT TEN NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION AGAINST BULAKITES, WINSLOW, JAC AND PROVIDENT MUTUAL

54. The Bulakites Defendants

incorporate by reference

their responses to the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 53 above as if more fully set forth herein. 55. Paragraph fifty-five is denied. 56. Paragraph fifty-six is denied. 57. Paragraph fifty-seven is denied. 58. Paragraph fifty-eight is denied.

22
LYNCH, TRAUB, KEEFE AND ERRANTE, P. C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 52 TRUMBULL STREET P.O. BOX 1612 NEW HAVEN, CONNECTICUT 06506-1612 TELEPHONE (203) 787-0275 FACSIMILE (203) 782-0278
W:\11000-11999\11437 B. BULAKITES\013 COMMERCIAL LITIGATION - SJE\PLEADINGS\2005\ANSWER & AFF DEFENSES TO SECOND AMD COMPLAINT DATED 9-29-05.DOC

Case 3:03-cv-00383-WIG

Document 297

Filed 01/30/2006

Page 23 of 28

COUNT ELEVEN UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES AGAINST BULAKITES, WINSLOW, JAC AND PROVIDENT MUTUAL 61. The Bulakites Defendants incorporate by reference

their responses to the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 60 of the NINTH COUNT as if more fully set forth herein. 62. As to paragraph sixty-two, the Bulakites Defendants

have insufficient knowledge from which to form an opinion or belief and therefore, leave the plaintiffs to their proof. 63. 64. 65. Paragraph sixty-three is denied. Paragraph sixty-four is denied. Paragraph sixty-five is denied. COUNT TWELVE BREACH OF IMPLIED-IN-FACT CONTRACT AGAINST BULAKITES, WINSLOW, JAC AND PROVIDENT MUTUAL 59. The Bulakites Defendants incorporate by reference

their responses to the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 58 of the TENTH COUNT as if more fully set forth herein. 60. 61. Paragraph sixty is denied. Paragraph sixty-one is denied.

23
LYNCH, TRAUB, KEEFE AND ERRANTE, P. C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 52 TRUMBULL STREET P.O. BOX 1612 NEW HAVEN, CONNECTICUT 06506-1612 TELEPHONE (203) 787-0275 FACSIMILE (203) 782-0278
W:\11000-11999\11437 B. BULAKITES\013 COMMERCIAL LITIGATION - SJE\PLEADINGS\2005\ANSWER & AFF DEFENSES TO SECOND AMD COMPLAINT DATED 9-29-05.DOC

Case 3:03-cv-00383-WIG

Document 297

Filed 01/30/2006

Page 24 of 28

COUNT THIRTEEN BREACH OF IMPLIED-IN-FACT CONTRACT AGAINST BULAKITES, WINSLOW, JAC AND LINCOLN 54. The Bulakites Defendants incorporate by reference

their responses to the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 53 above as if more fully set forth herein. 55. 56. Paragraph fifty-five is denied. As to paragraph fifty-six, the Bulakites Defendants

have insufficient knowledge from which to form an opinion or belief and therefore, leave the plaintiffs to their proof. COUNT FOURTEEN COMMON LAW CONVERSION AGAINST BULAKITES, WINSLOW, JAC, PROVIDENT MUTUAL AND LINCOLN 54. The Bulakites Defendants incorporate by reference

their responses to the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 53 above as if more fully set forth herein. 55. 56. Paragraph fifty-five is denied. Paragraph fifty-six is denied.

24
LYNCH, TRAUB, KEEFE AND ERRANTE, P. C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 52 TRUMBULL STREET P.O. BOX 1612 NEW HAVEN, CONNECTICUT 06506-1612 TELEPHONE (203) 787-0275 FACSIMILE (203) 782-0278
W:\11000-11999\11437 B. BULAKITES\013 COMMERCIAL LITIGATION - SJE\PLEADINGS\2005\ANSWER & AFF DEFENSES TO SECOND AMD COMPLAINT DATED 9-29-05.DOC

Case 3:03-cv-00383-WIG

Document 297

Filed 01/30/2006

Page 25 of 28

AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES First Affirmative Defense To the extent that Plaintiffs have suffered loss or damage, all such loss or damage, if any, was caused by the acts and conduct of the Plaintiffs and not by the acts and conduct of the Bulakites Defendants. Second Affirmative Defense Plaintiffs claims are barred, in whole or in part, by the

applicable statute of limitations. Third Affirmative Defense Plaintiffs claims are barred, in whole or in part, by the

doctrine of laches. Fourth Affirmative Defense The Bulakites Defendants acted in good faith and Plaintiffs are not entitled to recover attorneys Bulakites Defendants. Fifth Affirmative Defense Plaintiffs claims are barred, in whole or in part, by the fees and costs from the

doctrine of unclean hands.

25
LYNCH, TRAUB, KEEFE AND ERRANTE, P. C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 52 TRUMBULL STREET P.O. BOX 1612 NEW HAVEN, CONNECTICUT 06506-1612 TELEPHONE (203) 787-0275 FACSIMILE (203) 782-0278
W:\11000-11999\11437 B. BULAKITES\013 COMMERCIAL LITIGATION - SJE\PLEADINGS\2005\ANSWER & AFF DEFENSES TO SECOND AMD COMPLAINT DATED 9-29-05.DOC

Case 3:03-cv-00383-WIG

Document 297

Filed 01/30/2006

Page 26 of 28

Respectfully submitted, THE BULAKITES DEFENDANTS Barry L. Bulakites, James A. Winslow, and Joshua Adams Corporation

BY: ____________________________ STEVEN J. ERRANTE, ESQ. ERIC P. SMITH, ESQ. MARISA A. BELLAIR, ESQ. Fed. Bar No. ct04292 Lynch, Traub, Keefe, & Errante 52 Trumbull Street New Haven, CT 06510 Telephone: 203-787-0275 Facsimile: 203-782-0278

26
LYNCH, TRAUB, KEEFE AND ERRANTE, P. C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 52 TRUMBULL STREET P.O. BOX 1612 NEW HAVEN, CONNECTICUT 06506-1612 TELEPHONE (203) 787-0275 FACSIMILE (203) 782-0278
W:\11000-11999\11437 B. BULAKITES\013 COMMERCIAL LITIGATION - SJE\PLEADINGS\2005\ANSWER & AFF DEFENSES TO SECOND AMD COMPLAINT DATED 9-29-05.DOC

Case 3:03-cv-00383-WIG

Document 297

Filed 01/30/2006

Page 27 of 28

CERTIFICATION This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing was mailed on January 30, 2006 to all counsel and pro se parties of record via the United States Postal Service, postage prepaid, as follows: Joseph V. Meaney, Jr., Esq. Cranmore, Fitzgerald & Meaney 49 Wethersfield Avenue Hartford, CT 06114 Ian O. Smith, Esq. Thomas G. Moukawsher, Esq. Moukawsher & Walsh Capitol Place 21 Oak Street, Ste. 209 Hartford, CT 06106 Deborah S. Freeman, Esq. Sara R. Simeonidies, Esq. Bingham & McCutchen One State Street Hartford, CT 06103 James J. Reardon, Esq. Thomas G. Rohback LeBeouf, Lamb, Greene & MacRae 225 Asylum Street Hartford, CT 06103

27
LYNCH, TRAUB, KEEFE AND ERRANTE, P. C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 52 TRUMBULL STREET P.O. BOX 1612 NEW HAVEN, CONNECTICUT 06506-1612 TELEPHONE (203) 787-0275 FACSIMILE (203) 782-0278
W:\11000-11999\11437 B. BULAKITES\013 COMMERCIAL LITIGATION - SJE\PLEADINGS\2005\ANSWER & AFF DEFENSES TO SECOND AMD COMPLAINT DATED 9-29-05.DOC

Case 3:03-cv-00383-WIG

Document 297

Filed 01/30/2006

Page 28 of 28

Jean Elizabeth Tomasco, Esq. Theodore J. Tucci, Esq. Robinson & Cole 280 Trumbull Street Hartford, CT 06103 Telephone: 860-275-8323 Facsimile: 860-275-8299

____________________________ Steven J. Errante, Esq.

28
LYNCH, TRAUB, KEEFE AND ERRANTE, P. C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 52 TRUMBULL STREET P.O. BOX 1612 NEW HAVEN, CONNECTICUT 06506-1612 TELEPHONE (203) 787-0275 FACSIMILE (203) 782-0278
W:\11000-11999\11437 B. BULAKITES\013 COMMERCIAL LITIGATION - SJE\PLEADINGS\2005\ANSWER & AFF DEFENSES TO SECOND AMD COMPLAINT DATED 9-29-05.DOC