Free USCA Mandate - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

Case 3:03-cr—00223—EBB Document 94 Filed 05/31/2005 Page 1 of 1
‘? A 1
crmd“`wHM%@
03-cr-223 {
» Bama ”
l MAY 3l FD 2; 5;
United States Court of Appeals U.S. DlST"ltit2‘r‘ FUURT 1
Fon rua / ~— “' A
r sacorvn ciacurr NE lt! HAV t. tt. C T l
At a stated Term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, A
held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse at Foley Square, in the City
of New York, on the l2"' day of May, two thousand and five, l
Present:
Hon. Ralph K. Winter, $·\p1E TgF .
Hon. Sonia Sotomayor, .49 A \__ __ ·° p
Hon. Barrington D. Parker, Jr., g gm 12 imag %,
Circuit Judges. _, ` ` _;.
4 " -.rM»r .-·_”` »<
_ _ . m C§R¤"°
United States of America, 1
Appellee,
v. Docket No. 04-3915-cr
Bernabe Diaz, l
Defendant-Appellant.
` By order dated January 13, 2005, the Court granted the govemment’s motion for summary
affirmance but held the mandate pending United States v. Booker, 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005). In light of the
Supreme Court’s decision in Booker and this court’s decision in United States v. Crosby, 397 F.3d 103
(2d Cir. 2005), the parties have consented to a remand of this case to the district court for further
proceedings in conformity with Crosby.
. The disposition in the prior order of January 13, 2005, is vacated and the case remanded in
conformity with Crosby. i
Any appeal taken from the district court’s decision on remand can be initiated only by filing anew
notice of appeal. _S_eg Fed. R. App. P. 3, 4(b).
A party will not waive or forfeit any appropriate argument on remand or on any appeal post-
remand by not filing a petition for rehearing of this remand order.
FOR THE COURT: 1
A TRUE CQPY Roseann B. 1}/lacKechnie, Clerk r 1
Roseann MacKec‘1mj_ ” t 1
• __4 / 1
E I ERK By: · /
bY Oliva M. George, Denntv (`Tlérk \
. *
DE Y — .. sax I I l
·-ISSUED AS MANDATE: ,_f_2g Of .. !
_m_i
07 T O ·e·e-e-e -