Free Motion to Seal - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 50.8 kB
Pages: 2
Date: March 29, 2005
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 306 Words, 1,952 Characters
Page Size: 612.72 x 1008 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/22328/878.pdf

Download Motion to Seal - District Court of Connecticut ( 50.8 kB)


Preview Motion to Seal - District Court of Connecticut
I 22iAm_+..._...A.~»...._...._....__......._ ....._.,...I2__....- _
l ase 3:03-cr—OO198—RNC Document 878 Filed 03/ 9/2005 Page 1 of 2 V
I
HW
IIIII5- IIAII 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT C URT I
Sa; DISTRICT COURT E
DISTRICT OF CONNECT} UT ;mRTFGRD CT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA :
Piamafr f I I
VS. ; CRIMI AL No; 3;03CR198(RNC) l
I
STEVEN FONTANEZ ; I
I
Defendant : MARC 25, 2005
MOTION TO SEAL
I
The defendant respectfully requests that the accompa ying Defendant’s Memorandum
· in Aid of Sentencing be Sealed as to all eo—defendants, as sai motion contains confidential
I
information pertaining to the detendantfs case.

Respect lly submitted, |
I
THE DE ENDANT, _:__...I I
STEVE I FONTANQEZJPZI
/_.· _/ I
I l·.. iv .l--- 3/ ..
_, f' ,¤‘ I
I _..» I
BY .{Z,f'f " A .¤‘/I /
HJ en Gro ‘ s . {
4 0 Stillson Road
E irriekd, CT 06824
lephone: (203) 335-2112
F x No: (203) 335-7214 I
F d. Bar No: CT07570 i
I
I
I

1 U . ase 3:03-cr—0O198—RNC Document 878 Filed 03/ 9/2005 Page 2 of 2

1
1
l
'
(PROPOSED) ORDER
The motion set forth above having been duly considered, it i hereby
GRANT 11 / DENIED t
nono BLE ROBERT N. CHATIGNY
UNITE STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1
cERT1E1cAT1oN 1
This is to certify that because the accompanying moti n has been filed under seal and
contains confidential information, this motion has only been erved on Assistant U.S. Attorney
Gordon Hall, Office of the U.S. Attorney, 157 Church Street n New Haven, Connecticut 06510
and Probation Officer Jacqueline Carroll, U.S. Probation, 15 Church Street 22"d Floor, New
Haven, Connecticut, 06510. This motion has not been serve on any of gte co-defendant’s
attorneys for the reasons listed above.
A¢’·°°° Ai7··" 1
A~·i ‘ 1

J ,. ....
1
1
1
1
1

1
A 1
1
1
1
1
1 1