Free USCA Mandate - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

_ —--i-·-AY rrrrrrr .. an- —
.. Case 3:03-cr-00188-CFD Document 104 Filed 09/21 /2005 {jig? ;U01I;£C’__`___
y OQ 2 9%
UNITED STATES Coeur or APPEALS Fon THE SECOND Crncurr @@9 *0Q
Tnuncoon MARSHALL UNITED STATES Covnrnonse _
40 FOLEY SQUARE `
NEW Yomc, N EW Yoiuc 10007
E E
————————————————~P——————————— l
USA,
Appellee,
v. ` Docket No(s). 05-0408-cr
sPERo, A
. sttlti ““i£’;iit‘o i - ‘‘:: try
, Appslkmt- $9 ‘i“iE*°"" "i°»;>.. ·i;s~·
t ————————-—»-—--—-—»-- . AEAE te Se item T;.
"?:`_i.€i rf: lll]
. @0- In it ‘ S .
- OFRDER _ p ‘° ¤,»_ _ . . —··'
. Appellees motion, on consent of appellant, to remand appeal no. 05-0408 to the district
court in order to allow that court to determine whether to resentenee appellant in light ofthe
Supreme Court`s decision in United States v. Booker, U.S., 125 S.Ct. 738 (2005), and this
Court’s decision in United States v. Crosby, 397 F.3d 103 (2d Cir. 2005) is GRANTED with the
following modifications. Because the error in applying the Sentencing Guidelines mandatorily
was preserved for appellate review, the appeal is remanded to the district court with instructions
to vacate the sentence and resentence appellant: in conformity with Booker. See United States v. A
Fagens, 406 F .3d 138 (2d Cir. 2005). Any appeal taken from the district eourt’s decision on
remand can be initiated only by filing a new notice of appeal. See Fecl.R. App.P. 3, 4 (b). A party
will not waive or forfeit any appropriate argument on remand or on any appeal pcst—remand by
not tiling a petition for rehearing of this remand order. The mandate shall issue forthwith.
FOR THE COURT:
. ROSEANN B. MACKECHNIE, CLERK
By: [
F7
7*/L/~On ra
Date y W. Young, Motions Staff At rneyi
l
1
p __ it traits coast
R€§SCj¥ r;. 0 tts etree a , GLt·2l·Att .
.... .._. . ..._L , E 9 rg I
;Q2q§{-_r.Y_¤Q‘~¥i:.*Z'--`Z‘,.Qi] " l ` ` V - 7 I U I - nr W- ur 7:; nr 27 `: if-Q:-+':J—’___ ’ U- 7 i
‘e-s