Free Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

Case 3:03-cv-00232-DFM

Document 40

Filed 07/29/2005

Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT BRISTOUT BOURGUIGNON v. Case No. JOHN J. ARMSTRONG, et al. RULING AND ORDER Pending before the court is the plaintiff's motion seeking to resolve a discovery dispute concerning a set of interrogatories he served on the defendants in February 2005. The plaintiff files this motion in reply to defendants' objection to his motion for an order directing defendants to cooperate in discovery. On April 18, 2005, the court denied plaintiff's (See doc. # 33.) The present Motion to PRISONER 3:03CV232 (RNC) (DFM)

motion for order.

Resolve Discovery Disputes [doc. # 30] is DENIED for the reasons set forth in the court's April 18, 2005 Ruling. Pursuant to the court's prior ruling, the plaintiff may reserve his discovery request if he addresses it to a particular defendant. See Rule 33(a), Fed. R. Civ. P. ("any party may serve

upon any other party written interrogatories. . . .") SO ORDERED in Hartford, Connecticut, this 28th of July, 2005. /s/ Donna F. Martinez Donna F. Martinez United States Magistrate Judge