Free Order on Motion to Continue - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

..,.-=.-g=%aC3S€ 3:03-cv-00194-CF3 Document 31 Filed O3/03/20%} Page 1 lqézxhzfnfé
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT p
FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT V : if I
) ZUES {ZN"? -— Q A gg; 5,
rHoMAs E. TYNDALL, ) $:9;; e··, {-;,»;,,i,..; ,
) ·“` ~ ·1»1.’_ ‘
Plaintifi ) N L > _
vs.
3
)
NEW ENGLAND TEAMSTERS & TRUCKING )
INDUSTRY PENSION FUND, ) Case No. 3:03 94(CFD)
DAVID W. LAUGHTON, PAUL V. WALSH, )
ANTHONY S. BUONPANE, GEORGE W. ) gz: N ~
CASHMAN, J. LEO BARRY, JOHN J. ) :;..2 9* ?,
MCCARTHY, JR., WILLIAM M. VAUGHN·III, ) Q5 gig g "`W ·-
and J. DAWSON CUNNINGHAM, ) :‘° *f“'“ °
) cb lm
Defendants. I g EP, U @ .
\ 0 Q Q., "
_ VI DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST TO POSTPONE TRIAL CAQ E
x UNTIL AFTER THE COURT HAS RULED ON
\ DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE .
`_ M A SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
3 NOW COME Defendants, New England Teamsters & Trucking Industry Pension
. Q I md, et al, and hereby move the Court for a postponement of the Trial Call scheduled for
rch 4, 2005, until after the Court has ruled on Defendants’ Motion for Leave to File a
x 1 Motion for Summary Judgment. As grounds for their Motion, Defendants state as
S I {follows:
Q. \‘ . A s
Q § gg 1. On February 18, 2005, Defendants filed their Motion for Leave to File a
Supplemental Motion for Summary Judgment.
ji 2. Defendants attached to their Motion for Leave a Motion for Supplemental
Summary Judgment along with all supporting documentation.
I It