Free Motion for Summary Judgment - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

dm- Case 3:03-cv—OO158-HBF Document 46 Filed O9/O9/2004 Page10f2
I ·——— ~—— -- · I
UIII ICCI SIOICS DISNIFICI I I
mm: SI5? —q F; 3: Sb I
I."’."”"`I
(Tr? `II*-’II\,:wT(\{jI?!L-Ii" I
· I gf.f’T‘;·§i I
v W U ·I» ·r·z.}.._-
DI$TrI<;`I 0I? Cemnccllgel I
JOWIGS I`YW€;Il`; CI(\lII._ l`10, 5;O$C\/IS'? i
VS Ge II) (I—I BP)
Linde I"IIcs$cmiger,€IIIII SepTemg>€r;7 IJOOLI I
I FI S pI"C‘L5CO—I` I
I`ICICfI'W DO_l`S€ 3 r I %
_ DcI%ncIcI T5 cII“vI0Iuc;· Cm Cm, I ‘ -
@I.0‘imTIPl?S ITIc$TIbn For @mr*TbIL $¤mm¤rY N
I QIIAQLIQIYIQIQ-I
QUFSUQIWI T0_I?¤Ie 5(p,p5;CI.I?.CI\/.I;I QIOI¤`I_II?I?pl`£2S I
Jqmcgg FIl@In Pue$T$_I`I¤_I$ Q0xgI`I I0]gI`0¤T
hmil $UmmQI` df? GUOICIYITB I_IYlC,ICx €$S€Y]9€l`) OOQI Ins f`CSc;0j I
-IjT,ClI5() Helen IQ0r‘.§§:;}~$pI?c>r` elclmclgjeg For Theclew
IUI l`€>YInc—2 QIQINTI _ cal? YI/Ic Oleg process el? I
. ¤ . =I I
p]Ogn‘]‘{*§.`§Cg qppldqvll cmd IO\`\€I> In 5upp©r`T0FI
We m©"l`I<>n,
Jourvxc C; WIC *"‘“€>Y‘ I
I I &‘g',1‘I~‘§%"2> I:?s;C*%‘;·@:$é—%*»¤¤
e e ’ I 0 I? ZL -··<>¤¤ mw ‘—°>1¤°I°"* ·
J I I » Uyyccmswlllc C0rmecT*‘—¤T- O‘=3‘S'°2

__ Case 3:03-cv—OO158-HBF Document 46 Filed O9/O9/2004 Page20f2 W
r_ `
CerTx'Pn“c¤Tx`<>n e N
I h€i(`€bLj CGPTE MGT We CC>Y`(’;<5O4{Y)3 UJCUS Z
YY`|OxHQC[ TQ) Thg QKG p€Y`\C1CiY\T QTTOf`Y\C’j C> C
, 2
(`€CO{~(;‘ TVWIB DOL\g Op S€’{)T€YYlb€\` W
QOOLII
U6 ¥`erw<;\cmT$ Ir1c}¢ixYd0c¤| C<;¤p<;{<;n"T{Tc$
L\hC|Q YY)€S€Y1€j€f` [
If`?5 F) ¥`€$Cc>TT e W
Helen
I`?}-C):)O.("C! I CC’>c.)TUY`€’.
IQ S5 15T&mT Y—}TT<>mc· Gemml 4 g
HO, SVIEVVIQM ST|"cEj\` § \
l—lcmTpc>r~d C T __ , 0 e 5
OC?/OS Plmn \— · YM
G Lee I/VLC un cn ~ : `
gchrtggun 10¤cJ·g<:·wsk;l’ Pmx ] ¤
CG=¤m=;T¤4mqI` Im$T;"`]}gm j
ilJFr$,Cl;;?`rni¤Jl¢ch View Lcmcfcgq TP
25 0p.Q