Free Order - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

Case 3:03-cr-00140-CFD Document 67 Filed O4/O4/2008 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
V. CRIMINAL NO: 3:03CR00l40(CFD)
MARTEL ARRINGTON
ORDER MODIFYING TERM OF SUPERVISED RELEASE
On December 16, 2004, the above-named defendant, after a plea of guilty tc a violation of
l8 U.S.C. § 922(g)(l) and 924(e), Possession of a Firearm by a Convicted Felon, was sentenced to
63 months’ incarceration, to be followed by 3 years’ supervised release, as ordered by the Honorable
Christopher F. Droney, United States District Judge, sitting in the Court at Hartford, Connecticut.
On this date, in addition to the mandatory and standard conditions of supervised release, the Court
imposed special conditions requiring the defendant to participate in substance abuse treatment,
obtain and maintain employment, or participate in vocational or educational training and, prohibiting
the defendant from possessing a firearm or other dangerous weapons. Also, on January 28, 2008, at
the request ofthe Probation Office, the Court modihed the defendant’ s special conditions to include
mental health treatment,
The supervised releasee was presented before this Court on February 1, 2008, to answer the
charge that he violated the conditions of his supervised release as cited in a Petition on Probation and
Supervised Release dated January 14, 2008.
The supervised releasee was represented by Assistant Federal Defender Sarah A.L. Merriam,
and given the opportunity to be heard;

Case 3:03-cr-00140-CFD Document 67 Filed O4/O4/2008 Page 2 of 2
WHEREAS, the Court found that the supervised releasee had in fact violated one ofthe three
charges as cited within the Petition on Probation and Supervised Release; specifically, that the
defendant tested positive for Phencyclidine (PCP) on three separate occasions, December l0, 2007
and January 4 and 7, 2008; and that the defendant appeared before the Court for a final violation
hearing on March 28, 2008.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the defendant’s term of supervised
release to be continued, with the same mandatory, standard and special conditions remaining in full-
effect. However, Court imposed a sanction of 30 days home confinement (curfew) via electronic
monitoring with the Probation Office assessing the defendant’s ability to pay, or contribute to the
costs of such monitoring.
Signed and dated at Hartford, Comiecticut this of April 2008.
- /5/for -
The Ilonorable Chris opher F, Droney
United States District Judge
_ _ f