Free Order on Motion to Vacate (2255) - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 29.1 kB
Pages: 2
Date: January 20, 2005
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 289 Words, 1,788 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/21884/18.pdf

Download Order on Motion to Vacate (2255) - District Court of Connecticut ( 29.1 kB)


Preview Order on Motion to Vacate (2255) - District Court of Connecticut
Case 3:03-cr-00117-DJS

Document 18

Filed 01/21/2005

Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : : : : : : :

v.

Nos. 3:03CR117(DJS) 3:04CV1796(DJS)

JOHN DELGADO

ORDER This cause is before the court on defendant's motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence (dkt. # 13). Defendant asserts that the state court

convictions resulting in a significant enhancement to his federal sentence are invalid. In order to obtain relief from his federal

sentence, defendant must first seek to vacate his prior convictions by petitioning the courts that entered the prior judgments of conviction. Defendant does not set forth the basis

for believing that his prior convictions are invalid, nor does he disclose how he intends to have the convictions vacated. Defendant has filed the instant motion in an effort to comply with the governing statute of limitations for filing a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The Government seeks dismissal of

defendant's petition because it is not yet ripe. The court will reserve decision on the Government's request, as the U.S. Supreme Court has decided to resolve the governing question of timeliness under these circumstances in Johnson v. U.S., 340 F.3d 1219 (11th Cir. 2003), cert. granted, 125 S. Ct.

Case 3:03-cr-00117-DJS

Document 18

Filed 01/21/2005

Page 2 of 2

26 (2004).

All proceedings related to defendant's motion shall

be STAYED until the Supreme Court renders a decision, or, upon the motion of either party, the court becomes aware of a material change in circumstances. So ordered at Hartford, Connecticut, this 20th day of January, 2005. /s/DJS ________________________________________ DOMINIC J. SQUATRITO UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

-2-