Free Motion to Dismiss - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 30.9 kB
Pages: 3
Date: March 22, 2005
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 464 Words, 2,855 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/21845/147.pdf

Download Motion to Dismiss - District Court of Connecticut ( 30.9 kB)


Preview Motion to Dismiss - District Court of Connecticut
Case 3:03-cr-00100-RNC

Document 147

Filed 03/22/2005

Page 1 of 3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JUAN ROSARIO

: : : : :

Docket No. 3:03CR100(AHN)

March 22, 2005

MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTS TWO AND THREE OF THE INDICTMENT Pursuant to Rule 48(a) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and in accordance with the terms of the plea agreement entered by the parties on or about June 13, 2003, the Government hereby moves, post-sentencing, to dismiss Counts Two and Three of the Indictment in the above-referenced case as against the defendant, Juan Rosario.1 Pursuant to the terms of the plea agreement, Rosario: (1) pleaded guilty to Count One of the Indictment, charging him with a conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute and distribution of 500 grams or more of cocaine; (2) agreed to the forfeiture of the $17,315.00 in United States currecncy set forth in Count Three of the Indictment; and (3) pleaded guilty to an additional one-count information, charging him with a conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute and distribution of 100 grams or more of heroin. In light of the above, and pursuant to the terms of the plea agreement, the Government respectfully requests that the Court dismiss Counts Two and Three of the Indictment as against the defendant, Juan Rosario.

The forfeiture allegation was perhaps erroneously identified here as an additional "count" in the Indictment ­ the current practice is to simply notice items identified for forfeiture and the basis therefore in a "forfeiture allegation," rather than as a separate count. Because the forfeiture "count" nevertheless served the purposes of proper notice and the defendant agreed to the forfeiture of the $17,315.00 as part of his plea agreement, as a practical matter, the government sees no reason why the "forfeiture count" cannot be dismissed to clean up the docket.

1

Case 3:03-cr-00100-RNC

Document 147

Filed 03/22/2005

Page 2 of 3

In light of the above, and pursuant to the terms of the plea agreement, the Government respectfully requests that the Court dismiss Counts Two and Three of the Indictment as against the defendant, Juan Rosario. Respectfully submitted, KEVIN J. O'CONNOR UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

STEPHEN B. REYNOLDS ASSISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEY FEDERAL BAR NO. ct19105 UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE 915 LAFAYETTE BOULEVARD BRIDGEPORT, CT 06604 (203)696-3000 (203)579-5575 (fax) [email protected]

Case 3:03-cr-00100-RNC

Document 147

Filed 03/22/2005

Page 3 of 3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing was forwarded on this 22nd day of March 2005 to: Frank J. Riccio, Esq. Law Offices of Frank J. Riccio LLC 923 East Main Street P. O. Box 491 Bridgeport, Connecticut 06601-0491

STEPHEN B. REYNOLDS ASSISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEY